Search for: "R.C., a minor v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 129
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2016, 6:50 am
Ohio State Univ., 89 Ohio St.3d 369 (2000) (The fundamental policy of R.C. 149.43 is to promote open government, not restrict it) State ex rel. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 4:50 pm
But State v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 7:42 am
State v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 6:56 am
State v. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 8:28 am
Arbino v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 11:49 am
The Antoons argue that because the qui tam action was filed within one year of the dismissal of their state case, the state claim was preserved by Ohio’s saving statute, R.C. 2305.19(A). [read post]
20 May 2019, 4:57 am
State v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:53 am
On April 20, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 8:35 am
York v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 6:54 am
Ohio State Univ., 89 Ohio St.3d 369 (2000) (The fundamental policy of R.C. 149.43 is to promote open government, not restrict it) State ex rel. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:13 am
State v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:24 am
”) State v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 5:28 am
In Bickers v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 6:39 am
Pryor II v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 8:38 am
State v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:00 am
Horton v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 7:03 am
”) State v. [read post]