Search for: "R.C." Results 41 - 60 of 1,133
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2023, 5:38 am by Eugene Volokh
" "This requirement is satisfied if the material depicts or describes activity [that] meets the definition of 'sexual conduct'" under R.C. 2907.01(A), which includes cunnilingus. [read post]
So the recent class certification in the Central District of California in a case against R.C. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm by Christie Grymes Thompson
So the recent class certification in the Central District of California in a case against R.C. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm by Sherica Celine
Business Entities: IRS confirms with issuance of transitional guidance that no taxpayer is required to report the new excise tax imposed by R.C. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm by Sherica Celine
IRS Office of Chief Counsel issues memo reminding employers that certain wellness fixed-indemnity plan benefits are not excluded from employee income under R.C. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm by Richard A. Morehouse
Description Statute Max % Max Length Real Property Tax Exemption for Contamination Clean Up R.C. 5709.87, 100 10 years Real Property Tax Exemption for Contamination Clean Up R.C. 5709.88 100 10 years Municipal Corporation Enterprise Zone Real Property Tax Exemption R.C. 5709.62(C)(2), (C)(3) 100 15 years Megaproject – R.C. 5709.62(C)(4) 100 30 years County Enterprise Zone Real Property Tax Exemption R.C. 5709.63(B)(1)(b)(ii) 60 15 years … [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm by Richard A. Morehouse
Description Statute Max % Max Length Real Property Tax Exemption for Contamination Clean Up R.C. 5709.87, 100 10 years Real Property Tax Exemption for Contamination Clean Up R.C. 5709.88 100 10 years Municipal Corporation Enterprise Zone Real Property Tax Exemption R.C. 5709.62(C)(2), (C)(3) 100 15 years Megaproject – R.C. 5709.62(C)(4) 100 30 years County Enterprise Zone Real Property Tax Exemption R.C. 5709.63(B)(1)(b)(ii) 60 15 years … [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Baccala (Conn. 2017) (calling a store manager a "fat ugly bitch," and worse, and saying, "fuck you, you're not a manager," were not "fighting words" under facts of the case); People in the Interest of R.C. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 10:30 pm by Sherica Celine
IRS issues 2024 inflation adjusted amounts for Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) as determined under R.C. [read post]
23 May 2023, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
 More importantly, we conclude that the trial court complied with the applicable provisions of R.C. [read post]
22 May 2023, 11:40 am by Richard A. Morehouse
Following is a non-inclusive listing of public infrastructure improvements described in R.C. 5709.40. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 11:00 pm
”After she was awarded $4350 by the Queens County Civil Court, the defendant, R.C., a/k/a “Romeo,” appealed to the Appellate Term, Second Department.On its review of the record, the AT2 afforded “substantial deference” to the trial court, noting that it was in the best position to make credibility determinations and to “observe and evaluate the testimony and demeanor of the witnesses. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 9:56 am by Carly Boyd
A parent using medical marijuana in accordance with R.C. 3796 cannot be the sole basis for determining a child is an abused, neglected or dependent child. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:12 pm by Elizabeth Howell
R.C., a Child; and M.C., No. 2022-CA-0921-ME Barren Circuit Court After the Cabinet filed a dependency, neglect, and abuse Petition on behalf of Child who was transported to Kentucky from North Dakota (N.D.) by people other than her parents, the Family Court ordered the child be returned to N.D. for a trial home visit with her mother (Mother), who was also working a case plan supervised by the N.D. child-welfare agency. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 7:00 am by Rebecca Kopp Levine
R.C. 4123.56(F) does not impose an additional requirement on a claimant to prove he or she is unable to work solely due to an impairment arising from an injury or occupational disease. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 7:00 am by Rebecca Kopp Levine
R.C. 4123.56(F) does not impose an additional requirement on a claimant to prove he or she is unable to work solely due to an impairment arising from an injury or occupational disease. [read post]