Search for: "R.C. Fischer "
Results 41 - 60
of 149
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2018, 9:07 am
In a unanimous opinion written by Justice Fischer, with two appellate judges subbing for Justices O’Donnell and O’Neill, the Court upheld the constitutionality of Ohio’s death penalty sentencing scheme. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 7:18 am
(Justice Fischer brought this up at oral argument). [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 6:02 am
The Williamson decision addresses R.C. 2319.27, not R.C. 2303.21. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 6:32 am
R.C. 2929.18 does not define “victim. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 11:55 am
Therefore, R.C. 2107.15—Ohio’s voiding statute—does not apply to a noncomplying will under R.C. 2107.24. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 6:23 am
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Chief Justice O’Connor, Justices Kennedy, French, Fischer, DeWine, O’Donnell, and DeGenaro. [read post]
16 May 2018, 7:16 am
” Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Justices O’Donnell, French, Fischer, and DeWine. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 7:35 am
Justice Fischer has recused himself from the case. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 8:29 am
In Gonzales, Justice DeWine voted for reconsideration; Justice Fischer against, although once a majority ruled to reconsider, Fischer then felt obligated to consider the merits, and joined the majority. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 6:43 am
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Justices Kennedy, French, Fischer, and DeWine. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 7:55 am
Justice Fischer’s Position While Justice Fischer agree [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:58 am
Justice Kennedy wrote the lead opinion, joined by Justices French and Fischer. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 6:10 am
No: Chief Justice O’Connor, and Justices DeWine and Fischer Key Statutes and Precedent R.C. 2307.91(DD) (Asbestos claims—definitions: (Z) “Competent medical authority” means a medical doctor who is providing a diagnosis for purposes of constituting prima-facie evidence of an exposed person’s physical impairment that meets the requirements specified in section 2307.92. . . [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 6:25 am
In a 5-2 opinion written by Justice Kennedy, joined by Justices Fischer, DeWine, and DeGenaro and Twelfth District Court of Appeals Judge Michael E. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 5:12 am
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Chief Justice O’Connor, Justices DeGenaro, DeWine, Fischer, French, Kennedy, and O’Donnell.* *Chief Justice O’Connor and Justices DeWine and O’Donnell dissent in part and would accept the case only as to proposition of law 1. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 6:00 am
Waite of the Seventh District Court of Appeals sat for Justice Fischer, who has recused himself from the case. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 6:07 am
”) Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Justices DeWine, Kennedy, Fischer, Donnelly, and Stewart No: Chief Justice O’Connor and Justice French Key Statutes and Precedent R.C. 2919.25(A) (“No person shall knowingly cause or attempt to cause physical harm to a family or household member. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 8:40 am
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Chief Justice O’Connor, and Justices Fischer, Kennedy, and O’Donnell. [read post]
29 May 2018, 7:23 am
”) R.C. 1707.01 (Securities Definitions.) [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 4:55 am
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Justices French, DeWine, Donnelly, and Stewart No: Chief Justice O’ Connor and Justices Kennedy and Fischer Belinda’s Propositions of Law Accepted for Review Proposition of Law 1 A party’s request for custody does not constitute a complete abrogation of the physician-patient privilege under R.C. 3217.02(B) [sic.] where the mental and physical health records do not relate to the party’s ability to parent (Belinda appears to be… [read post]