Search for: "ROBERT GIVENS V. A. MILLER"
Results 41 - 60
of 283
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2020, 1:38 pm
Miller (Wikipedia) U.S. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 11:57 am
No, said an Eleventh Circuit panel (Judges Bert Jordan, Britt Grant & Robert Luck) today in Vallejo v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 11:57 am
No, said an Eleventh Circuit panel (Judges Bert Jordan, Britt Grant & Robert Luck) today in Vallejo v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm
Barrett’s willingness to look past possible abuse of discretion and violation of due process decried by the dissenting judges echoes Chief Justice John Roberts’s deferential reasoning in Trump v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 10:22 am
As the Supreme Court noted in Rosenberg v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 6:37 am
It was not long before Robert L. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 3:59 pm
Hughs and Miller v. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm
Resolved – IPSO mediation 08369-19 Miller v The Sunday Times, No breach – after investigation Resolution statement 07779-19 Wallace v Echo (Basildon), Resolved – IPSO mediation 07037-19 Foley v Mail Online, No breach – after investigation 06303-19 Hoy v Wisbech Standard, No breach – after investigation 06056-19 Baker v The Daily Telegraph, Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 05072-19 Smith… [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
Yet such creativity has its root in the imperative of constitutional survival, given the difficulty of amendment. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 6:49 am
Co. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
” In Brown, and then emphatically in Loving v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
Policy As part of our policy efforts (discussed in greater detail here) we have intervened jointly with the Federation of Law Societies of Canada before the Supreme Court in the Keatley v. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 8:58 am
That was the issue presented to Arbitrator Robert E. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:34 pm
The court of appeals vacated the sentence, concluding that the trial court applied an incorrect legal standard by focusing on the nature of the offense and not whether the defendant was, within the meaning of Miller v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 2:09 pm
This could suggest that courts may consider purely legal questions concerning the interpretation of Article V, but not factual questions concerning whether a given state has actually ratified a particular amendment. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
In Frese v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 1:28 pm
In 2012, in Miller v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
Nonetheless, there have been many interesting and important constitutional questions raised in the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom over the last few days in the joint appeals of R (on the application of Miller) v The Prime Minister and Cherry and others v Advocate General for Scotland, in which the applicants seek a declaration of illegality in relation to Parliament’s most recent prorogation. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 10:29 am
Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s decision to prorogue the UK Parliament last week reminded us of Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s twice-proroguing of the Canadian Parliament in the space of about a year. [read post]
