Search for: "ROEMER v. ROEMER" Results 41 - 53 of 53
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2012, 3:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
All of the documentary evidence demonstrated that the relationship necessary to invoke the continuous representation doctrine terminated in August 2006, and the plaintiff's submissions did not indicate that her trust and confidence in the defendants continued, or was restored, after that date (see Rupolo v Fish, 87 AD3d 684; Krichmar v Scher, 82 AD3d at 1165; Marro v Handwerker, Marchelos & Gayner, 1 AD3d 488; Piliero v Adler & Stavros, 282 AD2d 511,… [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 8:10 am by Rick Hasen
We hope the Commission is able to begin with the Supreme Court’s definition of Non-Coordinated as “expenditures … made totally independently of the candidate and his campaign” in Buckley v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 12:34 pm by David Lat
For example: “Did you read what Judge O’Scannlain wrote in al-Kidd v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:29 am
Vacating a disciplinary arbitration awardRoemer v NYC Bd. of Ed., 268 AD2d 479, Motion for leave to appeal denied, 94 NY2d 763 The Roemer decision serves as a reminder that the grounds for appealing a Section 3020-a disciplinary determination are very limited. [read post]