Search for: "ROGERS v. SELLS" Results 41 - 60 of 426
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am by Eric Goldman
My post summarizes the Court’s ruling and discusses its implications for brand owners, companies that sell parody products, and anyone interested in trademark law. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:30 am by Howard Knopf
LSUC) And even more recent principle as enunciated by the Supreme Court of Canada in Rogers v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 4:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
By Holly Hayes Bovio One month ago, we started our health care conflict resolution series (see Part I,  Part II, Part III, and Part IV) focusing on the Roger Fisher, William Ury Getting to YES principled negotiation method involving: 1. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:08 pm by Travis Crabtree
Not the First Example I twice wrote earlier about the Roger Cleveland v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 11:55 am by Thomas James
” The Appeal The main point MSCHF is raising on appeal is that the district court should have applied the rule announced in Rogers v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:16 pm by Benjamin Beaton and Lauren Kuley
Good Faith and Probable Cause: In another en banc decision, Judge John Rogers and eleven others held in United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:16 pm by Benjamin Beaton and Lauren Kuley
Good Faith and Probable Cause: In another en banc decision, Judge John Rogers and eleven others held in United States v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
Source: USPTO  Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 1:32 pm
 Justice Nares rejects the proposition that, as he puts it, "because Rogers, a private property owner, obtained a conditional use permit to operate horse stables they have enjoyed using for 20 years, the public has a right under CEQA to prevent Rogers from making some other lawful use of his land. [read post]
18 May 2022, 5:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
Rothschild argues that, because the digital images of the Birkin bags that are tied to the NFTs he sells are "art," the Second Circuit's test in Rogers v. [read post]