Search for: "Railroad Commission of Texas v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 68
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2015, 9:30 pm
Wilson, Railroad Commission of Texas v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 2:05 am
United States. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
The Court will not hear an appeal of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision which reversed the lower court’s ruling that the State of Texas had violated the Endangered Species Act in its administration of the state water permitting program which allegedly denied adequate amounts of fresh water at the Aransas, Texas Whooping Crane preserve. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:51 am
State v. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 1:36 pm
A plat with the same false information had already been filed with the Railroad Commission. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 4:13 am
Hooks alleged that Samson paid a higher effective royalty rate to the state of Texas. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 9:33 am
Pietras On September 2, 2014, the Department of Justice announced a settlement in United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 9:33 am
On September 2, 2014, the Department of Justice announced a settlement in United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 11:00 am
STATE OF TEXAS v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:09 am
The Commission denied review, making the ALJ’s decision the Commission’s final order. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 10:30 am
The Texas Supreme Court’s summary of the issues states that the principal issue is “whether a mineral-rights owner exercised reasonable diligence, to avoid limitations, by obtaining a copy of the Samson plat filed with the Texas Railroad Commission but not a third-party survey in Railroad Commission records that would have shown the operator’s fraud. [read post]
8 Mar 2014, 7:19 am
As to this claim, the panel found that the district court properly abstained from deciding the issue under the doctrine set forth in Railroad Commission of Texas v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:46 am
Assemblyman V. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 11:04 am
Texas Department of Public Safety v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:34 pm
* * * Here is the complete Fifth Circuit order: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT … [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
§ 646.214(b)(3) and (4), thereby preempting state-law claims of negligence.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (Supreme Court of Texas)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief for Constitutional and Administrative Law ScholarsPetitioners' reply Title: Lonberg v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 12:11 pm
Because Morris involved transportation of goods not passengers, the Third Circuit looked at cases arising in other contexts that defined interstate transportation of passengers, including United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
The company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $310,000, of which $155,000 will be paid to the United States and the other $155,000 to Virginia. [read post]
