Search for: "Raphael v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 169
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2015, 12:41 pm by Robert C. Weill
  They did not believe that the decision accepted for review expressly and directly conflicts with Raphael v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 5:57 pm by Trey Childress
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently decided the case of Applied Medical v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 3:38 am by Amy Howe
In an interview at the blog of the Harvard Law and Policy Review, Virginia Solicitor General Stuart Raphael discusses the amicus brief that his state filed in the challenges to state bans on same-sex marriage. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 10:47 am by Emily Dai
And Robert Loeb and Cesar Lopez-Morales wrote about United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, even if a plaintiff establishes the first prong, the plaintiff must still demonstrate that he or she would have succeeded on the merits of the action but for the attorney's negligence (see Hamoudeh v Mandel, 62 AD3d 948, 949; McCluskey v Gabor & Gabor, 61 AD3d 646, 648; Peak v Bartlett, Pontiff, Stewart & Rhodes, P.C., 28 AD3d 1028, 1030-31; see also Brodeur v Hayes, 18 AD3d 979; Raphael v Clune, White & Nelson, 201 AD2d… [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 "A waiver of the attorney-client privilege may be found where the client places the subject matter of the privileged communication in issue or where invasion of the privilege is required to determine the validity of the client's claim or defense and application of the privilege would deprive the adversary of vital information (see Hurrell-Harring v State of New York, 75 AD3d 667, 668; 601 Realty Corp. v Conway, Farrell, Curtin & Kelly, P.C., 74 AD3d… [read post]
30 Jul 2022, 6:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Anderson sat down with Derek Muller to discuss the independent state legislature doctrine in light of the pending Supreme Court case Moore v. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
On 21 April 2022, the United States, Canada, Japan, Singapore, the Philippines, the Republic of Korea and Chinese Taipei published a declaration establishing the Global Cross-Border Privacy Rules Forum. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am by INFORRM
On 15 December 2023, as stated above, Fancourt J handed down judgement in favour of the claimants in the case of The Duke of Sussex and Ors v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3217 (Ch). [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am by Just Security
”  South Africa had argued that the imposition of such a requirement would follow the model the Court had used in the provisional measures phase of Ukraine v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 4:28 am by Howard Friedman
John Raphael who was removed by the Josephites, but who continues to serve as president and is contesting his removal both in a state court breach of contract lawsuit and through Church channels. [read post]
16 May 2007, 8:23 pm
United States Tobacco (working paper, 2007). [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 10:31 am by axd10
Hurlock The International Court of Justice: Effectively Providing a Long Overdue Remedy for Ending State-Sponsored Genocide (Bosnia-Herzegovina v. [read post]