Search for: "Rather v. Rather" Results 41 - 60 of 76,457
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2009, 2:15 am
Regina v Sherif; Regina v Ali (Siraj); Regina v Ali (Muhedin); Regina v Mohamed; Regina v Abdurahman; Regina v Abdullahi Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “The seriousness of terrorist activity about which a defendant failed to give information, rather than the extent of the information that could have been provided, was what determined the level of criminality [...] [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Failure to perform found to result from incompetence rather than misconduct Transit Auth. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 12:08 pm
However, he has been a consistent champion of reproductive choice and will make preserving women's rights under Roe v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:41 pm by Giles Peaker
 [1992] 2 AC 386 and  Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd. v Berrisford [2011] UKSC 52 as both taking the view that the LPA 1925 “seemed to underwrite the established common law position”, rather than invalidating the previous common law position on ‘hybrid’ tenancies. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 10:05 am by PaulKostro
Thus, an expression of assent that modifies the offer does not act as an acceptance, but rather serves as a counter-offer. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 5:32 am
On Friday, a New York federal district court issued a temporary injunction in a creche case, Ritell v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 4:28 pm
Superior Court: "it makes no difference that the charged conduct took place in cyberspace rather than real space. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 4:03 am
Hearing officer suggests employee be permitted to retire rather than be terminatedFire Dep't v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 5:45 am by PaulKostro
In other words, the expert must “`give the why and wherefore of his or her opinion, rather than a mere conclusion. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 4:15 am
Jury’s decision in favor of plaintiff based on speculation rather than logical inference based on the evidence vacated Miller v Nassau County Civ. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 1:38 am by sally
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 4); Same v AN; Same v AE [2010] EWCA Civ 869; [2010] WLR (D) 205 “Control orders which the Secretary of State for the Home Department revoked rather than disclose the evidence on which they were made should have been quashed with effect from the dates they were made, because they were made in violation of the right to a fair trial under art 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and… [read post]