Search for: "Redeemer v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 530
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2020, 8:06 am
(Supreme Court of the State of Delaware, May 2, 2019, Leaf Invenergy Company, v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:10 pm
While the Supreme Court professes to follow the tiered scrutiny doctrine set out in cases such as Washington v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 2:39 pm
In short, the court stated that Defendants were attempting to impose Revlon duties, as applied to Maryland law in Shenker v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 10:31 pm
[has or has not] exercised any right to redeem provided under the contract or State law, in a timely manner as provided under State law . . . . [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 12:45 pm
” Sprenger v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 6:58 am
Dardarian v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 12:21 pm
Justice Harlan, Roth v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 9:26 am
Assoc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 1:24 am
In the fall of 2005, Associated notified Gordon Grocery that it had failed to satisfy the minimum purchase requirements of the cooperative, and that Associated would redeem Gordon Grocery's shares, thereby terminating their relationship. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 8:26 am
State v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 3:10 pm
A divorcing couple whose assets included a Madoff ponzi scheme account must abide by the terms of their contract, the New York Court of Appeals unanimously ruled today in the closely-followed case of Simkin v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 3:35 am
[Footnotes omitted] In the omitted footnotes, the opinion cites the above-mentioned Nixon v Blackwell and Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Nemec v Schrader in which it rejected a claim that directors of Booz Allen breached fiduciary duty by exercising redemption rights under an officers stock plan to redeem the shares of retired officers at a lower price in anticipation of a lucrative merger with the Carlyle Group. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 9:03 pm
Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule brilliantly argue in their recent book, Law and Leviathan: Redeeming the Administrative State, the administrative state can be justified by its adherence to the rule of law. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 2:16 am
Lord Toulson stated that considering the principles of Target Holdings v Redfern, a monetary reward which reflects neither loss caused nor profit gained by the wrongdoer, such as the one argued by the appellant, would be penal. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 7:32 am
Government issued paper money, individual banks would issue bank notes that were redeemable for a stated quantity of gold at that particular bank. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 6:37 am
In Stein v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 11:17 pm
They have some thoughts on Jones v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 2:13 pm
"So the woman who can't name a case other than Roe v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 8:12 am
The case of Regions Bank v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 7:56 am
Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments from the SEC and a mutual fund regarding the SEC’s decision to deny the fund’s application for an exemption for its method of accounting for potential deferred tax liability (Copley Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
