Search for: "Redevelopment Agency of the City and County of San Francisco"
Results 41 - 60
of 80
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2018, 6:42 am
If you haven’t heard of us before, EFF is a nonprofit based in San Francisco that works on the local, national and global level to defend and advance civil liberties as technology develops. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 7:58 pm
San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (2020) ____ Cal.App.5th ____, and my 1/6/21 post on it can be found here. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 10:33 am
(April 20, 2022. ) [4] Inventorying San Francisco Bay Area Parking Spaces: Technical Report Describing Objectives, Methods, and Results. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
Cucchi and Kristen Kortick https://www.cpuc.ca.gov/rps/ Although cities and counties in California face health and safety shutdowns from the pandemic, utilities must continue essential services and remain in compliance with pre-existing laws. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:14 am
City of Santa Clara (2011) 194 Cal.App.4th 1150: A city and its redevelopment agency entered into a “term sheet” for the development of a professional football stadium development project. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm
City of Santa Clara (2011) 194 Cal.App.4th 1150: A city and its redevelopment agency entered into a “term sheet” for the development of a professional football stadium development project. [read post]
12 May 2014, 12:21 pm
On May 28, 2014, at 9 a.m. in its San Francisco courtroom, the California Supreme Court will hear oral argument in this significant Fifth District case (Supreme Ct., Case No. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 10:35 am
County of San Luis Obispo (2011) 197 Cal.App.4th 1312). [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 4:35 pm
City and County of San Francisco (2013) 222 Cal.App.4th 863 and Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 10:06 pm
City of San Diego, S238563. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 11:51 am
City and County of San Francisco (2014) 229 Cal.App.4th 1043, 1051-1052 [contrasting “traditional procedure” whereby petitioner requests agency to prepare record with CEQA statute’s “other record preparation options to help reduce record preparation costs”].) [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
City of San Diego (2019) 7 Cal.5th 1171 The City of San Diego amended its zoning code to permit cannabis enterprises as a use within a number of zoning districts in the City. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
City of San Diego (2019) 7 Cal.5th 1171 The City of San Diego amended its zoning code to permit cannabis enterprises as a use within a number of zoning districts in the City. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 10:29 am
The new VMT methodology will not be mandatory until July 1, 2020, unless implemented early by a lead agency, as has been done by the City of San Francisco. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:20 pm
City and County of San Francisco (2002) 102 Cal.App.4th 656, which essentially treated the failure of an urban redevelopment project located at a transit hub to “self-park” and the consequent need for project users to “hunt for scarce parking spaces” as a “social inconvenience,” rather than a significant environmental impact subject to CEQA review in its own right. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
City of San Diego, S238563. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 3:17 pm
A prominent example is the ongoing CEQA challenge to the environmental review for the Central Valley to San Francisco route of the High-Speed Rail Project, which involves lawsuits that have stretched over parts of 7 years and are not yet concluded — although a recent appellate decision appears to have brought them a step closer to the driving of the final CEQA litigation spike. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
The Project and First Lawsuit The Martha Company (“Martha”) owns 110 acres overlooking the San Francisco Bay near the town of Tiburon. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
County of San Diego (September 28, 2018, case no. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
Shelley Finlayson, chief of staff and program counsel at the ethics agency, will fill in as director on an acting basis. [read post]
