Search for: "Reed v. High"
Results 41 - 60
of 663
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2023, 1:50 am
(Fourth issue) The Supreme Court’s judgment Lord Reed, Lord Lloyd-Jones and Lord Kitchin, with whom Lord Hodge agreed, gave the majority judgment, with Lord Carnwath dissenting in part. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 7:05 am
Yesterday, federal District Judge Reed O'Connor issued a decision in Braidwood Management, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 8:53 am
Elrod v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:58 am
Arabella passed the bar with high marks, certifying her as the first female lawyer in the U.S. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 5:00 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
Schwartz reviews the long line of cases beginning with Harlow v. [read post]
Federal Judge Suggests Abortion May Be Protected Under 13th Amendment’s Ban on Involuntary Servitude
7 Feb 2023, 4:56 am
However, the standard for sanctions is fairly high. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 2:23 am
Lord Leggatt, with whom Lord Reed and Lord Lloyd-Jones agree, gave the majority judgment. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 3:22 am
Singapore Court of Appeal clarifies right to private action under the Singapore PDPA In a related development, in September 2022, the Court of Appeal in Singapore handed down a significant decision in Reed, Michael v Bellingham, Alex (Attorney-General, intervener) [2022] SGCA 60, clarifying that emotional distress can constitute “loss or damage” required to found a statutory right to private action under the Singapore PDPA. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 8:24 am
I expect some courts will say there’s no censorship if any one of the elements discussed above is missing, essentially turning this case into a high bar that few other cases will reach. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 8:06 am
This was also an issue for the Singapore High Court in The “STI Orchard” [2022], SGHCR 6 on which Reed Smith has reported here. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 3:45 am
Policymakers interested in increasing tax rates should recognize the unintended consequences of high taxation rates. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 10:45 am
Nonetheless, like Casey does, one can tentatively proceed at a high level of generality, assuming a legal system that has a relatively independent judiciary, a legislature that delegates power, hierarchical and expansive bureaucracy supervised at the upper echelons by executive actors, and a constitution. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 11:00 pm
BRAZIL The second round of voting in the Brazilian presidential elections took place on 30 October 2022. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 9:19 am
Significance of this decision The decision in Goh overrules the sentencing framework set out in the previous High Court decision of Takaaki Masui v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 8:40 am
” Reed v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 4:26 am
Lord Reed and Lord Hodge adopted a formulation that the Creditor [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 3:10 am
In October 2022, the High Court in KeyHealth Medical Scheme v Ngoepe No and Others considered whether the court a quo was correct in finding that a medical scheme was prohibited from using day-to-day benefits to fund the treatment and costs of Prescribed Minimum Benefit (PMB) conditions. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 6:00 pm
[1] BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2022] UKSC 25. [2] Companies Act 2006, section 172. [3] Companies Act 2006, section 172(3). [4] BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2019] EWCA Civ 112. [5] BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2022] UKSC 25 [7] (Reed LJ). [6] Companies Act 2006, Part 23. [7] https://www.supremecourt.uk/press-summary/uksc-2019-0046.html [8] https://www.supremecourt.uk/press-summary/uksc-2019-0046.html [9] (n 4). [10] BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2022]… [read post]
