Search for: "Reid v. Adams" Results 41 - 53 of 53
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2011, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
But the High Court has already ruled in a similar case (where protesters chanted “burn in hell”, “baby killers” and “rapists” at British soldiers) that prosecution under the public order act was legitimate, and that freedom of speech will not have been impaired by ““ruling …out” threatening, abusive or insulting speech” (Lord Reid, in Brutus v Cozens [1973] AC 854, at p. 862). [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
He further added: vii) If the line between legitimate freedom of expression and a threat to public order has indeed been crossed, freedom of speech will not have been impaired by “ruling …out” threatening, abusive or insulting speech: per Lord Reid, in Brutus v Cozens [1973] AC 854, at p. 862. viii) The legislature has entrusted the decision in a case such as the present to Magistrates or a District Judge. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm by Isabel McArdle
He further added: vii) If the line between legitimate freedom of expression and a threat to public order has indeed been crossed, freedom of speech will not have been impaired by “ruling …out” threatening, abusive or insulting speech: per Lord Reid, in Brutus v Cozens [1973] AC 854, at p. 862. viii) The legislature has entrusted the decision in a case such as the present to Magistrates or a District Judge. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:13 pm by charonqc
The restriction confirmed by the courts in Whaley v Lord Watson 2000 (later confirmed by the House of lords). [read post]
11 May 2010, 7:30 pm by Anna Christensen
This post was compiled with assistance from Adam Schlossman. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Reid (New York University). ? [read post]