Search for: "Render v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 18,847
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2024, 2:18 pm
Dairy Export Council et al. v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 10:30 pm
The UCTD aims at restoring such imbalance by rendering unfair contractual terms not binding on consumers (para. 28). [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:57 am
Earlier this year, the Fourth Circuit decided United States v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:51 am
Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
In my blog post on the case, I praised the decision and predicted “that the Supreme Court will eventually grant a petition … and render a definitive decision regarding the discovery rule. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
Stating that it had never directly addressed the question and citing Daimler7 and Magill v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 3:42 pm
Ernst & Ernst v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:54 am
In addition, a Satisfaction of Judgment was filed on February 24,2021 stating that the Judgment was paid in full and the sum of $0.00 remains unpaid (NYSCEF Doc. [read post]
12 May 2024, 1:42 pm
VILER, Appellants, v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 1:18 pm
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
11 May 2024, 10:09 am
This money judgment, however, only states that a party must pay a particular sum. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:01 am
Circuit’s application of the Fitzgerald test in Blassingame v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
9 May 2024, 9:32 am
State v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:29 am
Federal Trade Commission, 3:24-cv-986, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, filed April 23, 2024; Chamber of Commerce for the United States of America et al. v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:43 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
