Search for: "Reply in Support of Motion to Establish Public Briefing Schedule"
Results 41 - 60
of 63
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
§ 2254 (Dkt. 1); the response filed in opposition thereto (Dkt. 7); Petitioner’s Reply (Dkt. 11); the parties’ Supplemental Memoranda (Dkts. 25, 31, 36); and the Amicus Brief filed in support of Petitioner. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 2:25 pm
The government’s response to this motion, filed a week ago, is not yet public, nor is Obaydullah’s reply–which is due today. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:56 pm
All of these briefs are available on the Al-Nashiri II docket page. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 12:13 pm
There are standard schedules that should be followed, such as for briefing on merit-based motions, or in that unique Delaware action, the "summary proceedings. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
The County of Santa Clara filed a motion to intervene on August 15, 2011 so that it could represent its own interests. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
The County of Santa Clara filed a motion to intervene on August 15, 2011 so that it could represent its own interests. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 8:21 pm
Filing an adversary proceeding in the debtor’s bankruptcy case, or filing a motion for relief from the automatic stay on grounds supported by bankruptcy law, are two ways to collect from debtors in bankruptcy. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 9:38 am
The motion was fully briefed by the parties (an opening brief, an answering brief and a reply brief) and the court held a hearing on the TRO motion on Monday. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm
No oral arguments are scheduled until October, and no Conferences are scheduled until Monday, September 26, when the Justices will be formally back at work. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:57 am
The Court agreed, concluding that the ARB "provided little to no facts or data to support the conclusion. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
§ 646.214(b)(3) and (4), thereby preempting state-law claims of negligence.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (Supreme Court of Texas)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief for Constitutional and Administrative Law ScholarsPetitioners' reply Title: Lonberg v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:15 am
FACTUAL and PROCEDURAL HISTORY Miracle Star, owned and operated by Jeffrey and Staretta Moffatt, provides drug and alcohol treatment and rehabilitation services at a location in Lancaster, California. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
” CRST's Petition in Support of the Motion (“CRST Fees Brief”) (docket no. 282-22), at 5. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 4:10 am
The petition had the support of the American Bar Association, the Committee for Economic Development, Public Citizen, a group of appellate lawyers, and various government reform groups. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
The fact that a state statute authorizes capital punishment does not conclusively establish the punishment's constitutionality because the Eighth Amendment is a limitation on both legislative and judicial action. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 4:10 pm
"OP 770 provides that the DAI Director will ensure that a sufficient number oflethal injection team members will be maintained.As to news media witnesses at executions, OP 770 provides, "When an executionis scheduled, the CDCR, Assistant Secretary, Office of Public and EmployeeCommunications,[6] will notify the media and establish a 10-day filing period in whichmedia may request to witness the execution. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 5:57 pm
§ 1331, which establishes jurisdiction over cases "arising under" federal law. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
On January 24,2008, one week later, the State filed its reply brief.10. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
" 'The rule is well established that a reviewing court must presume that the record contains evidence to support every finding of fact, and an appellant who contends that some particular finding is not supported is required to set forth in his brief a summary of the material evidence upon that issue. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 10:49 pm
ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT MARTIN J. [read post]
