Search for: "Response Brief for the United States Regarding Jurisdiction" Results 41 - 60 of 1,111
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2022, 5:16 am by Hayley Evans
For example, a State Department representative stated that the U.S. is “pleased to see that the ICC prioritized its resources to focus on the greatest of allegations and atrocity crimes … [having] long objected to the ICC’s attempt to assert jurisdiction over nationals of non-state parties such as the United States absent the consent of the state or a UN Security Council referral. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 9:00 pm by Dean Falvy
Some of the most damning evidence in the briefregarding Trump’s hours of inaction after the Capitol siege began—is based on press reports that rely on blind quotes from unidentified officials. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 2:04 pm by NARF
State of Alaska (Indian Child Welfare Act; Jurisdiction) U.S. [read post]
Below, we provide a high-level summary of the position across a number of key jurisdictions. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 10:14 am by lcampbell@lawbc.com
”  A separate dissent stated that the court should have dismissed the case for lack of jurisdiction. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 4:11 am by Peter Margulies
Third, Steve asserts that the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces’ decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2008, 2:37 pm
 It further required that the majority representative “be responsible for representing the interest of all such employees without discrimination and without regard to employee organization membership. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 3:02 pm by NARF
City of Seattle (Federal court jurisdiction) Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2023.html United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:04 am by Sarah Cleveland
  South Africa then tempered its response to the litigation, as did the United States. [read post]
31 Aug 2008, 6:51 pm
In West's United States Code Annotated, the notes following 28 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Mar 2013, 10:09 am by Alan Rozenshtein
As Steve noted on Tuesday, the government petitioned for rehearing in the military commission case of United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 5:53 pm by Wells Bennett
 The United States denied this and insisted that Section 7 of the Military Commissions Act of 2009 barred jurisdiction over al-Madhwani’s claims in any event. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 11:29 pm
The U.S. brief filed in advance of oral argument cites as the "threshold jurisdictional question" in the case whetherUnited States courts lack jurisdiction to review the detention of individuals held broad pursuant to international authority, including individuals held by United States forces acting as part of a multinational force. [read post]