Search for: "Response Brief for the United States Regarding the Court's Order for Petitioner to Show Cause" Results 41 - 60 of 107
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2007, 8:19 am
BONA FIDE Truthfully, honestly and without deceit BRIEF A legal document presented to the court BURDEN OF PROOF One spouse must prove any claims made against the opposing spouse to the court. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 5:40 am by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 03353 (2d Dept.,2023) Petitioner, a friend of the minor child’s family, commenced aproceeding to be appointed as the guardian of the child and subsequently moved for the issuance of an order enabling the child to petition the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) for special immigrant juvenile status. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 2:41 pm by Ben Sperry
United States could have an impact on statutory construction going forward. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm by Joel R. Brandes
” The case law that exists regarding adultery is restricted to trial judgments and appeals for much of the past century and more. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
But the government waived its right to file a responsive brief, so unless [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
U.S. 488 U.S. 361 (1988)Justice BLACKMUN delivered the opinion of the Court.In this litigation, we granted certiorari before judgment in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in order to consider the constitutionality of the Sentencing Guidelines promulgated by the United States Sentencing Commission. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 1:28 pm by Jonathan Holbrook
In response to the new criminal charge the defendant moved to suppress the handgun as the fruit of an illegal warrantless search, arguing that a warrantless search of his residence was unconstitutional under the federal and state constitutions in that it was not authorized by statute or as a matter of consent. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm by Law Lady
GARLAND GEORGE CURTIS, Defendant-Appellant. 11th Circuit.Criminal law -- Sentencing -- Unopposed motion for continuance of resentencing hearing pending review in United States Supreme Court of decision of United States Court of Appeals which obligates trial court to impose 30-year sentence rather than 17-and-a-half-year sentence initially imposed for offense of production of child pornography for transportation into this country --… [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:01 pm by MOTP
“When reviewing a trial court order dismissing a cause for want of jurisdiction, Texas appellate courts ‘construe the pleadings in favor of the plaintiff and look to the pleader’s intent. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am by Abbott & Kindermann
The state and the Park District jointly prepared the Eastshore State Park General Plan. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am by John Elwood
By the way, we’ve already looked, and the briefs in opposition for the relisted cases didn’t arrive any later than the BIOs for the briefs that were granted last Thursday. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm by Anna Christensen
Norton Simon Museum of Art at PasadenaDocket: 09-1254Issue(s): (1) Whether, in enacting a state statute extending the statute of limitations applicable to claims for the recovery of property stolen during the Holocaust against museums and galleries, the State of California was addressing an area of “traditional state responsibility” without intruding on the federal foreign affairs power; (2) whether a state statute extending the statute of… [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:54 am by William L. Pfeifer, Jr.
Scope of remedy Subject to the limitations of Rule 32.2, any defendant who has been convicted of a criminal offense may institute a proceeding in the court of original conviction to secure appropriate relief on the ground that: (a) The constitution of the United States or of the State of Alabama requires a new trial, a new sentence proceeding, or other relief. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 1:47 pm by Chuck Ramsay
Correspondence and other materials will only be accepted if they are in regards to general administrative matters. [read post]
18 May 2011, 5:13 am by Eugene Volokh
 5).Nothing appears in the record of this case that shows that the CFI questioned the credibility of the testimony of the petitioner or his witness during the hearing, nor the correction to the transcript presented. [read post]