Search for: "Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings"
Results 41 - 48
of 48
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2014, 12:35 pm
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, 506 A.2d 173 (Del. 1986) [see generally here] to maximize stockholder value in a change-in-control transaction. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 4:21 pm
’”). [6] In Revlon, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
A seller choosing to hold an auction must carefully consider what the "rules of the game" will be. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
., Revlon, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 11:29 am
Delman v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 8:07 pm
Consider, for example, the proposed sale of Netsmart Technologies, Inc. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:22 am
., returns in excess of that necessary to maintain the asset in its current use.[3] If such quasi-rents are appropriable by the party with control of the transaction specific asset, a hold up problem ensues. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]