Search for: "Rhymes v. Rhymes"
Results 41 - 60
of 285
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2019, 9:29 am
In a recent ruling issued by the Southern District of California, Ewing v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 3:00 am
An old familiar rhyme. [read post]
11 May 2021, 3:45 am
” While the two terms in Applicant’s proposed mark rhyme, the rhyming quality imparts no new or different meaning to “DANK TANK. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 5:04 am
That rhymes. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 8:12 pm
” v. [read post]
4 May 2008, 3:10 pm
See, e.g., Yamashita v. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 10:42 am
Freeman v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 3:02 pm
Schwab's first name ("Chuck") and a different word that rhymes with "Chuck" and occasionally comes before the word "You. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 3:06 pm
While the old nursery rhyme is wrong in declaring that “words will never hurt me,” it is equally untrue that “words will always hurt me. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 7:00 am
The topic of software, combined with the need to rhyme with "spots," caused IPKat to receive numerous entries referring to the language of "dashes and dots". [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 10:47 am
http://goo.gl/C4CFOYou may remember that Guy Fawkes received some attention on this side of the pond around this time last year, when Occupy Wall Street protesters used Guy Fawkes masks from V for Vendetta to symbolize resistance to oppression. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 7:45 am
Peters, p/k/a Vince P. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 8:51 am
I'm referring to Arizona v. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 4:58 am
Michael Eakin in the 2002 case of Porreco v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 3:00 am
I’ve started to have questions about the impact of Riley v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 6:04 am
Do you Bar examination candidates need some catchy rhymed verse to help you to remember certain elusive case holdings or legal doctrines? [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 11:59 am
The post Keezio v. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 11:59 am
The post Keezio v. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 4:08 pm
In Busch v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 9:13 am
Meade got me to go to a ball game: It was an interesting game, and ultimately the Brewers won 5-4 (the baseball score that sounds like a Supreme Court decision) — on a big home run from Rickie Weeks (rhymes with "WikiLeaks"). [read post]
