Search for: "Rich v. District of Columbia" Results 41 - 60 of 106
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2012, 12:46 am by Lawrence Solum
The first thread tells the captivating story of District of Columbia v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 9:46 am
His work so upset plaintiffs' law firm Milberg Weiss that they engaged in a vendetta against Fischel and Lexecon, leading to a defamation suit by Fischel and Lexecon that led to a landmark Supreme Court decision about multi-district litigation (Lexecon Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 12:41 am
D.C. 471, 1899 WL 16315 (C.A.D.C. 1899), the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, a predecessor of the D.C. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 8:14 am by Brianne Gorod
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit subsequently rejected that conclusion, Kavanaugh wrote a dissent, calling into question Humphrey’s Executor and thus the constitutionality of all independent agencies. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 12:26 pm by Mary B. McCord and Annie L. Owens
Bruen represents the first significant Second Amendment case to be taken up by the Supreme Court since District of Columbia v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 6:40 pm
(collectively, “CLS”) by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia holding that certain claims of Alice’s U.S. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 5:23 am by Aaron Tang
Our first topic of the week is Florence v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:31 am by INFORRM
In Duffy v Trendowen ([2010] SADC 152) the District Court of South Australia awarded damages of Aus$13,000 in respect of statements at a meeting of a District Council by the defendant alleging that the plaintiffs, as members of the previous Council, were corrupt. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 1:20 pm by June Casey
Lazarus also does an excellent job illuminating the inner workings of the Supreme Court and of the second most important court in the land—the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:26 pm
Adapting Adrienne Rich’s critique of “compulsory heterosexuality,” I've argued that "compulsory matrimony" could be just as damaging. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm by froomkin@law.tm
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 4.0) 1. [read post]