Search for: "Richards v. DOT" Results 41 - 60 of 84
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2012, 9:11 am by Guest Blogger
Nathan Chapman and Michael McConnellWe appreciate the lively discussion of Justice Chase’s opinion in Calder v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
  In addition to the editors and executives, the proprietor of Express Newspapers, Richard Desmond, gave evidence. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
On 21 December 2011, Eady J gave judgment in the “harassment” case of Neocleous v Jones ([2011] EWHC 3459 (QB)) Two judgments were also given in relation to “phone hacking indemnity” claims, Coulson v NGN ([2011] EWHC 3482 (QB)) and Mulcaire v NGN ([2011] EWHC 3469 (Ch)). [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:28 am by judith
Over the past couple of years, there has been a great deal of discussion — particularly in relation to the Durham Statement [1] — about technical standards and preservation issues for law reviews that publish openly and exclusively online. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:21 am by David A. Moss
" Treatment gives us a chance to connect the dots to what fuels our addiction. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 8:05 am by JB
As the Court explained in Bartnicki v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 6:37 am by admin
The court in Bear Creek Master Assn. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:56 pm by Nick Holmes
Lord Justice Toulson in R v Chambers [2008] EWCA Crim 2467 famously bemoaned the complexity of legislation: To a worryingly large extent, statutory law is not practically accessible today, even to the courts whose constitutional duty it is to interpret and enforce it. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 8:52 am
A pregant woman (Tameche Brown) was badly injured when a driver (Gregory Crawley) hydroplanned and struck her Honda CR-V on 04/28/08. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charon QC
  This should go some way to explaining why there are random Cicero quotations dotted about the place. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:05 am by Little Richard
I’ve rounded to keep the math simple:Base Salary: Biglaw Brian — $145k; Little Richard — $65kBonuses: Biglaw Brian — $45k; Little Richard — $2kHours Worked: Biglaw Brian — 3,200; Little Richard — 2,100Hours Billed (includes Pro Bono hours): Biglaw Brian – 2,400; Little Richard — 1,300Based on total dollars received and hours worked, Brian’s salary works out to an hourly wage of just under $60. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 9:11 am by Little Richard
Keep ‘em coming, to Little Richard dot JD at gmail dot com, and come find me on Twitter (@LittleRichardJD).Earlier: Great Expectations? [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 8:01 am by structuredsettlements
  Yet I find it amusing to know that at some point the dots will be connected between these over the top marketers and their own failure to disclose. [read post]