Search for: "Richardson v. Richardson" Results 41 - 60 of 1,590
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Further, the Appellate Division noted the letter was addressed to the IG urging the commencement of an investigation and said that in reviewing the full context of the communication, "including its tone and purpose," it concluded that Defendant "set out the basis for [her] personal opinion, leaving it to the [IG] to evaluate it for [herself]", citing Brian v Richardson, 87 NY2d 46 [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Further, the Appellate Division noted the letter was addressed to the IG urging the commencement of an investigation and said that in reviewing the full context of the communication, "including its tone and purpose," it concluded that Defendant "set out the basis for [her] personal opinion, leaving it to the [IG] to evaluate it for [herself]", citing Brian v Richardson, 87 NY2d 46 [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:34 pm by Giles Peaker
In Marreco v Richardson (1908) 2 KB 584, the Court of Appeal had found In other words, if a man pays his tailor’s bill by cheque and the cheque is accepted as payment, the tailor cannot sue for his account until the cheque has been presented and dishonoured. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
This paper is much narrower—Sunstein is really unpacking some of the conservative SCOTUS bloc’s internal debates about the MQD in Biden v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 10:11 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
IDR Process Suspended The IDR process currently is suspended following the August 3 , 2023 ruling by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Texas Medical Association v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 4:14 am by ernst
Richardson, which declared noncitizens to be a “discrete and insular minority” under the Equal Protection Clause, catalyzed an extraordinary era of litigation in support of the civil rights of noncitizens. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Out-of-state employers, insurers, employee benefit plan vendors, and other businesses registered to do business in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, or another state that requires that out-of-state businesses consent to jurisdiction as a condition of their registration to do business in the state face a heightened risk of getting hauled into court in the consent to jurisdiction state following last month’s Supreme Court decision in Mallory v. [read post]