Search for: "Richardson v. Transitional" Results 41 - 60 of 66
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2017, 6:38 am by Joy Waltemath
And because he did not allege a physical impairment within the meaning of the ADA, he failed to show that the transit authority regarded him as having a qualifying physical impairment, said the court, granting summary judgment against his regarded as claim (Richardson v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:43 am by Joy Waltemath
The court also rejected the employer’s other arguments, including that the employee was required to allege his obesity was perceived to limit a major life activity (Richardson v. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 9:38 am by Lorene Park
Though authority is split on whether a plaintiff alleging discrimination based on obesity must ultimately prove the obesity results from a physiological disorder, the employee was not required to allege a physiological cause in his complaint (Richardson v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
Richardson School of Law—Implementing Free Prior and Informed Consent: Expanding the Role of Communities in the Global Energy Transition 4:45 pm – 6:00 pm Closing of Conference and Reception   __________George Foster started with an introduction setting the stage for the materials to come. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 22 June 2016, Sir David Eady heard applications in the case of Richardson v Google UK Ltd. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 8:46 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Finally, the Final Rule provides for a a two-year transition phase in of the new AEWR starting with requiring 80 percent of the full wage from the effective date of the Final Rule through calendar year 2016, then 90 percent in calendar year 2017, and full implementation beginning in calendar year 2018. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Richard Pildes
Remarkably, the Court has only focused on this substantive question at all in one case, Burns v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 11:00 am by Guest Blogger
Richardson, for requiring classifications based on sex to withstand strict scrutiny; the year before the Court had ruled in Eisenstadt v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 11:58 am by David Lat
(Disclosure: Randazza served as counsel to Above the Law when we were sued in 2009, in Jones v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:36 pm by Timothy Sandefur, guest-blogging
In a 1924 profile of Oliver Wendell Holmes, Dorsey Richardson wrote that Holmes came to the bench in 1882, when the transition from individualism to collectivism in England was in progress.... [read post]
31 May 2010, 11:57 am by law shucks
And when it’s former-associate v. firm, that’s all the more interesting. [read post]