Search for: "Rick Pildes"
Results 41 - 60
of 260
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2022, 9:08 am
Tom Edsall gave Rick Pildes the last word–actually the last several paragraphs–in his latest column. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 4:30 am
I've expressed my skepticism in numerous places, but you can find a fairly concise explanation at pages 696-701 of this article in the Catholic Law Review, which reproduces remarks I delivered at a 2019 Federalist Society panel with Professors Sai Prakash and Rick Pildes, as well as Judge Thomas Hardiman and then-Judge (now-Justice) Amy Coney Barrett. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
” Rick Pildes has aptly described this provision as a loaded weapon, lying around for an unscrupulous state legislature to invoke. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:55 am
A bipartisan group of scholars -- Ned Foley, Mike McConnell, Rick Pildes, and Brad Smith -- published an op-ed laying out a good framework for reform. [read post]
6 Nov 2021, 7:00 am
Rick Pildes (NYU) presented Political Fragmentation in Democracies of the West at Virginia yesterday as part of its Oxford-Virginia Legal Dialogs hosted by Tsilly Dagan and Ruth Mason: The decline of effective government throughout most Western democracies poses one of the greatest challenges democracy currently confronts. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 6:30 am
For the Balkinization symposium on Rosalind Dixon and David Landau, Abusive Constitutional Borrowing: Legal globalization and the subversion of liberal democracy (Oxford University Press, 2021).Samuel IssacharoffAt first glance, the work of Ros Dixon and David Landau on constitutional borrowing appears to be centered on the role of constitutions and courts in securing or compromising democratic governance. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 10:48 am
Commissioner Rick Pildes, a professor at New York University School of Law, commended the idea of term limits, mentioning that it seemed like there is “a great deal of support behind” it and that, although practitioners seem resistant to many ideas, most think term limits are acceptable. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 9:30 pm
Presidential Supreme Court Reform Commission Division: Princeton on Keith Whittington and three alumni (Heather Gerken, Rick Pildes, Bertrall Ross). [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 2:00 am
Vanderbilt Law School – Rick Pildes, Sudler Family Professor of Constitutional Law, NYU School of Law, presents today as part of the Faculty Workshop Series. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 4:02 pm
“Clarifying the Electoral Count Act Process”: The “Election Law Blog” has posted this statement from law professors Richard Pildes, Edward Foley, Rick Hasen, Lisa Manheim, and Nate Persily. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 12:26 pm
Rick Pildes wrote a concise summary of the opinion. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 4:43 am
Rick Pildes and Joshua Tucker did a two part series on the different permutations of what could happen, but this seems to fall within the cracks. [read post]
15 May 2020, 3:56 am
” At the Election Law Blog, Rick Pildes pushes back against the electors’ argument that chaos might also result from a ruling for the states, explaining why “[t]he Court should feel free to resolve the cases without any concern that permitting states to bind their electors creates any meaningful risk, even if we ever face, for the first time, a situation in which a winning candidate dies in the 5-6 weeks between the election and the meeting of the Electoral… [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 5:11 pm
Rick Pildes responds here. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 4:21 am
” At Balkinization, Rick Pildes describes the decision as “a powerful example of what I call an ‘institutionally realist’ approach to judicial review of executive branch action. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 2:49 pm
Adler for The Volokh Conspiracy; Jay Michaelson for The Daily Beast; and Rick Pildes for Balkinization. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 4:28 pm
Davis”: Rick Pildes has this post at the “Balkinization” blog. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:58 am
At Balkinization, Rick Pildes maintains that “Justice Gorsuch’s majority opinion … in Davis, striking down a federal criminal statute as unconstitutionally vague, bears a close relationship, which is likely to be missed, to his dissenting opinion last week on the delegation doctrine in the Gundy case. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
Rick Pildes, What is Judicial Courage? [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
Rick Pildes raises the related and important question of what legal elites care about, and he points out that the concern of these elites with the legal integrity of decision-making can lead Justices to take legal integrity into account. [read post]
