Search for: "Rick Wolf"
Results 41 - 60
of 216
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2018, 4:33 am
” At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen warns that “if the Court cannot come up with something, and puts the issue off for another day, the last best chance to rein in partisan gerrymandering by the federal courts may be lost for at least a generation. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:32 am
” Commentary comes from Mark Joseph Stern at Slate and Rick Hasen at the Election Law Blog, who offers some possible explanations for why it took the justices so long to dispose of this request. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:04 am
Additional coverage of NIFLA, which will be argued tomorrow, comes from Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, Richard Wolf at USA Today and Andrew Chung at Reuters. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
National: A Super PAC Has Raised Millions to Mobilize Black Voters. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 1:39 pm
Wolf, 443 U.S. 595 (1979), the Supreme Court said "neutral principles" may be applied in church property cases. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm
Tom Wolf signed House Bill 1175, which requires lobbying disclosure reports to be filed electronically with the Pennsylvania Department of State. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 3:46 am
At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen discusses the dismissal in the Texas case. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 4:18 am
For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that “[t]he justices agreed Friday to hear two cases challenging congressional and state legislative districts in Texas, adding them to ones already pending from Wisconsin and Maryland. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 4:33 am
” At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen gives a rundown on the “state of play” in the various partisan-gerrymandering cases “at, or heading, to SCOTUS. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:19 am
At the Election Law Blog, Rick Pildes observes that “[d]eciding to hear the Maryland case is a significant signal that a majority of the Court is not going to hold partisan gerrymandering claims to be non-justiciable (that is, inappropriate for judicial resolution)” in the first partisan-gerrymandering case this term, Gill v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:59 am
” Commentary on the grant in Benisek comes from Rick Hasen at the Election Law Blog and Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, who notes “several differences” between Benisek and the court’s other pending partisan-gerrymandering case, Gill v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:17 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Rick Garnett offers a link to a video discussion about the implications of last term’s decision in In Trinity Lutheran v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 4:19 am
At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen speculates about whether the plaintiffs will ask the Supreme Court to lift its stay of the lower court’s order requiring the Wisconsin legislature to draw new districts by November, asking “why … Wisconsin voters [should] endure another election with an unconstitutional map, if we know where this thing is going to end up? [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:17 am
Another preview comes from Rick Titcomb and Vadim Belinskiy at Cornell. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 4:36 am
At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen lines up the reasons why Justice Anthony Kennedy might take one side or the other in partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 11:51 am
Según la orden ejecutiva del Gobernador Rick Scott, a Wolfe ¨se le prohíbe realizar cualquier acto oficial, deber, o función en una oficina pública¨. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:19 am
” At USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that Edith Windsor, “the New York octogenarian whose Supreme Court victory in 2013 forced the federal government to recognize same-sex marriage and led to its legalization two years later, died Tuesday. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
Howard Wasserman and Rick Garnett look at both of today’s First Amendment decisions at PrawfsBlawg, here and here, respectively. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 4:38 am
At USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that “the ritual was but a speed bump in a high court career that’s already off to a fast start. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:57 am
At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen observes that “the balancing test that the Court puts forward for when a special election should be held makes great sense, and will extend beyond the racial gerrymandering cases. [read post]
