Search for: "Riffe v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 82
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2013, 8:30 am
V. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 5:44 pm
Mann in 1830 and State v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 3:56 am
That's what Shelby County Circuit Judge Hub Harrington found in Burdette v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 8:25 pm
(For example, United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 4:55 am
The Lanham Act arose in the gamespace during 2009’s James “Jim" Brown v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 7:52 am
United States but in dissent.See, when you dig down into the Third, there's all kinds of resonance. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm
Dukes, and Turner v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 2:43 pm
Most recently, in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:42 am
v=43f2bBjGi_8 Now, that’s quite a quirky repertory, and it stands in favorable comparison to Tom’s: the periodic table, plagiarism, pollution, the new math, the Vatican II conference, and of course the silent letter ‘e’. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 5:31 pm
” Now let’s look at a sample case: In Conning v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 12:40 pm
") United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 5:28 am
(Isn’t this also true of the riff in 2 Live Crew’s Pretty Woman? [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 11:57 am
” United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:53 am
What I’ll do here – as an amateur, with no particular expertise in Crosskey’s work itself – to riff a bit on this scholarly (non?) [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 10:48 pm
(Though, really, read Jenny Diski's Riff on it from the Times Magazine back in May.) [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 5:38 pm
Order at 5 n.1 (citing Bauknight v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:22 am
One of the decisions I have always had a warm spot for is Mapp v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 6:07 am
So when your client is sued in West Virginia state court, one of the first things to consider is removal.That's what happened in Hartman v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 5:39 pm
" Although I found the opinion in FCC V. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 3:20 pm
In Bridgeport, the court concluded that Section 114’s use of the word “entirely” precluded any unauthorized digital sampling. 6 The court stated that if “an artist wants to incorporate a ‘riff’ from another work in his or her recording, he is free to duplicate the sound of that ‘riff’ in the studio. [read post]
