Search for: "Robert A. Powell" Results 41 - 60 of 838
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2023, 7:33 am by Ronald Mann
Pritchard (at the University of Michigan) and Robert Thompson (at Georgetown University), have produced a compelling and accomplished examination of that history in A History of Securities Law in the Supreme Court. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 8:41 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
19 defendants – Donald Trump, Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman, Mark Meadows, Kenneth Chesebro, Jeff Clark, Jenna Ellis, Ray Smith, Robert Cheeley, Michael Roman, David Shafer, Shawn Still, Stephen Lee, Harrison Floyd, Trevian Kutti, Sidney Powell, Cathleen Latham, Scott Hall, and Misty Hampton. 41 counts [Trump faces 13 counts] – 22 Related to forgery or false documents and statements; 8 counts related to soliciting or impersonating public officers; 3 counts related to… [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
In Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation v Public Service Commission of New York 447 US 557, 566 (1980) Powell J (for the Court) held that, in such cases, a four-part analysis has developed: At the outset, we must determine whether the expression is protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:13 am by Kate Fort
However, there was a new issue that arose in In re Robert F. and In re Ja. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am by Eric Goldman
Justice Sotomayor wrote a concurring opinion, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Kagan and Barrett, which agreed with the majority on the judgment only. [read post]
Grutter also reaffirmed Justice Powell’s opinion announcing the judgment of a splintered Court in Regents of Univ. of California v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”“The harm from discriminatory jury selection,” Powell wrote, “extends beyond that inflicted on the defendant and the excluded juror to touch the entire community. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by SHG
  Indeed, as Chief Justice Roberts pointed out, Justice Sotomayor cited Justice Powell “barely once,” while Justice Jackson “ignores Justice Powell altogether. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 3:15 pm by Josh Blackman
  Indeed, as Chief Justice Roberts pointed out, Justice Sotomayor cited Justice Powell "barely once," while Justice Jackson "ignores Justice Powell altogether. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 5:01 am by jonathanturley
Powell Jr. stopped short of barring the use of race in admissions entirely. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 7:07 am
The majority of the Court — judging from the main opinion (by Chief Justice Roberts) and the Gorsuch concurrence — says "critical mass" as if it's practically nonsense, and the dissenters avoid it — perhaps because as long as they've lost, they have something else they'd prefer to say about the reason for supporting affirmative action. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:55 pm by Scott Bomboy
In Powell’s view, such a policy did not specifically exclude anyone from admission. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am by Public Employment Law Press
On June 29, 2023 the Supreme Court held that colleges and universities making "admission decisions" that relied, in part, on racial considerations violated the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am by Public Employment Law Press
On June 29, 2023 the Supreme Court held that colleges and universities making "admission decisions" that relied, in part, on racial considerations violated the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 2:12 am by Ann Lipton
While there, I took part in a panel discussion of Adam Pritchard and Robert... [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Special prosecutors like Robert Mueller and Jack Smith are now appointed pursuant to Justice Department guidelines and political pressure. [read post]
30 May 2023, 4:35 pm by admin
The Memorandum, and Justice Powell’s subsequent majority opinion in First National Bank of Boston v. [read post]