Search for: "Robert Kopell"
Results 41 - 60
of 99
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
How did Robert Abplanap make his fortune? [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 7:55 pm
Solicitor General Robert Bork was next in line, and he later recounts that he too considered resigning, but then decided that the constitutional crisis would be even worse if the President could not find a cabinet official who would carry out his orders. [read post]
21 May 2014, 1:00 pm
Randy Barnett led the merry gang, which also included Ilya Somin, David Kopel and Jonathan Adler. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:05 pm
(David Kopel) Issue number 5 of this year’s Connecticut Law Review is an excellent symposium on firearms law, policy, and culture. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 8:39 am
(David Kopel) The events of November 1963 and their aftermath are described in Chapter 9 of my undergraduate thesis The Highbrow in American Politics: Arthur M. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 11:59 am
The debaters will be Sandy Levinson and Alan Dershowitz against Dave Kopel and me, and a live video stream will be available starting 6:45 Eastern tonight at this site, or (in theory) just by clicking below: For an extra Volokh Conspiracy connection, note that Intelligence2 U.S. was launched by Robert Rosenkranz, the father of our own Nick Rosenkranz. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 10:45 am
(Ilya Somin) Today is the publication date for A Conspiracy Against Obamacare: The Volokh Conspiracy and the Health Care Case, a book I coauthored with VC co-bloggers Jonathan Adler, Randy Barnett, David Bernstein, Orin Kerr, and David Kopel. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:40 am
Chief Justice Roberts’ conclusion that the individual mandate was not “proper,” even if it was “necessary” may be one of the most significant aspects of the Supreme Court’s decision. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
30 May 2013, 10:00 am
The contributors are Orin Kerr, Randy Barnett, David Bernstein, Ilya Somin, Jonathan Adler, and David Kopel; Paul Clement wrote the foreword. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 6:05 am
Oh, ABC: “America’s Wrongest Reporter” Brian Ross achieves another feat of wrongness [Hans Bader] “Don’t turn Aurora killer into celebrity” [David Kopel, USA Today] For the media: five tips on how not to misreport the gun angle [Robert VerBruggen, NRO] Ed Brayton of Dispatches from the Culture Wars challenges me on the War For Roberts’ Vote, and I respond; The “contains peanuts” warning on a peanut jar [Point of… [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 5:44 am
David Kopel has provided what he calls a bar-review-style summary of NFIB v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:11 pm
At Scotusblog, David Kopel summarizes the decision in “law review” style, the way that next year’s First Year students might describe the case in their class outlines. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:11 pm
At Scotusblog, David Kopel summarizes the decision in “law review” style, the way that next year’s First Year students might describe the case in their class outlines. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:17 am
At the Volokh Conspiracy, David Kopel concentrates on the hypothetical “window tax” discussed in the Chief Justice’s opinion, arguing that it is “one more piece of evidence that Chief Justice Roberts was wrong in stating that the individual mandate ‘tax’ is not a direct tax. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:17 am
At the Volokh Conspiracy, David Kopel concentrates on the hypothetical “window tax” discussed in the Chief Justice’s opinion, arguing that it is “one more piece of evidence that Chief Justice Roberts was wrong in stating that the individual mandate ‘tax’ is not a direct tax. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 11:27 am
(David Kopel) In NFIB v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:31 pm
Kopel, adjunct professor of constitutional law, Denver University. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 3:25 pm
Although we do not know Chief Justice Roberts’ motives, I suggestion a comparison of NFIB to Marbury v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 2:46 pm
(David Kopel) Yesterday I interviewed Ilya Somin about the NFIB decision, particularly the portion involving the Necessary and Proper Clause. [read post]
