Search for: "Robert Thomas Quick v. the United States" Results 41 - 60 of 99
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2017, 8:40 pm by Dale Carpenter
” Id. at 2606; see also id. at 2623-24 (Roberts, C.J., dissenting, joined by Justices Scalia and Thomas) (lamenting that cases involving selective tangible benefits “will not arise now that the Court has taken the drastic step of requiring every State to license and recognize marriages between same-sex couples. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Michelle Meyer, Geisinger Health System, (Still) Waiting to Exhale: Why the Future of Biospecimens Research Remains Unclear after the Final RuleMark Rothstein, University of Louisville School of Medicine, International Health ResearchNicolas Terry, Indiana University Robert H. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by SOG Staff
  Have you read the United States Supreme Court’s opinion in Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by SOG Staff
  Have you read the United States Supreme Court’s opinion in Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Michael Schaps
Article III provides that federal courts may hear “cases” and “controversies,” including “all cases, in law and equity, arising under . . . the laws of the United States . . . . [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am by Marty Lederman
 First, a quick note on the government's new final rules regarding the religious accommodation (including its extension to some for-profit employers such as Hobby Lobby, Inc.). [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Tongue in cheek, Roberts quoted a 1985 law review article criticizing Roe v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 7:03 am
Kennedy then attaches a list of lower court rulings, state court rulings, and legislation recognizing a right to same-sex marriage. 10:35: Roberts has the primary dissent, although Alito, Scalia, and Thomas have also dissented. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 11:24 am by Mark Walsh
Justice Thomas is up next, with the opinion in Baker Botts L.L.P. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 7:06 am by Kent Scheidegger
United States is 4-1-4, with Justice Ginsburg writing the plurality opinion and Justice Alito concurring in the judgment in a separate opinion. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:56 am
IP and Retail: a quick reminder. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 10:04 am by Prashant Reddy
By, George Yu            On June 17, 2013, the United States Supreme Court issued a 5-3 decision (Justice Alito having recused himself) in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 8:09 am by Gene Quinn
By: Gene Quinn (IPWatchdog.com) Last week, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the matter of Bowman v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:27 pm by Rory Little
  But in 2005, the Supreme Court ruled in United States v. [read post]