Search for: "Robinson v. Superior Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2008, 12:04 pm
Robinson v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 11:58 am
Notably, the opinion favorably cites Robinson v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 8:16 pm
The Court remanded for consideration in light of Arizona v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 6:55 am
Superior Court, 208 Cal. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 5:51 am
See Robinson et al v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 12:07 pm
See Danvers Motor Co. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 3:04 am
” The fact the test results were negative were apparently not considered relevant as the court commented that it noted that Robinson’s behavior continued to be erratic.The court concluded that “considering DOC’s responsibility for the safety of its officers as well as the inmates they oversee and its exposure to liability for any injury that might result ... its precautions cannot be viewed as unreasonable or discriminatory. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 6:00 am
Superior Court 114 Cal.App.4th 723 (2003) and Arntz Builders v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 8:01 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 8:01 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 8:50 am
Aguas v. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 12:38 pm
I have no details yet, but this report indicates that a very dramatic lawsuit was filed Wednesday in San Francisco Superior Court: Eowyn v. b.b. [read post]
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Vincent de Fontbrune v. Alan Wofsy, Docket No. 19-16913
5 Oct 2022, 3:00 am
(…) Before Wofsy filed the Review Proceeding, though, Sicre de Fontbrune brought the instant action in the Superior Court of California in Alameda County in November of 2013, seeking recognition of the astreinte judgment. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 7:25 am
Robinson, 2019-1574 (La. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 10:49 am
Supreme Court decision has applied this principle—to the status of being addicted to drugs or alcohol (Robinson v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 8:00 am
hat appellate court decision was handed down in 2011 under the name of Sperl v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 3:28 am
Robinson's liability, the Association had available the same statute of limitations defense that was available to Dr. [read post]
6 May 2022, 2:22 pm
Which is why I have no problem with today's opinion.But the California Supreme Court should nonetheless take up the case for the precise purpose of overruling that portion of In re Estate of Robinson. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 5:55 am
Robinson v. [read post]
