Search for: "Rogers v. Grimaldi" Results 41 - 60 of 184
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2014, 8:55 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 As for trademark, I'm hard pressed to see likely confusion, but given how expansive the doctrine has become, you might not even need dilution, unless a court sees this as a Rogers v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 5:36 pm by Irina Manta
Grimaldi threshold test) just because the work contained expressive content. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  On the plus side, the Fourth Circuit resoundingly endorses Rogers v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm by Ted Max
Grimaldi test was too permissive of “expressive works” that cause confusion.[8] Counsel for Jack Daniels advocated elimination of the Rogers v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am by Ted Max
Grimaldi test was too permissive of “expressive works” that cause confusion.[8] Counsel for Jack Daniels advocated elimination of the Rogers v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am by Ted Max
Grimaldi test was too permissive of “expressive works” that cause confusion.[8] Counsel for Jack Daniels advocated elimination of the Rogers v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 9:48 am by Eric Goldman
The court acknowledges all of the right considerations, including non-use, nominative and descriptive use, Rogers v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 8:42 am by Hannah R. Albion
In summary, the court ruled that the exclusion of Lanham Act liability, established by the Second Circuit precedent (Rogers v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 11:55 am by Thomas James
In that case, Ginger Rogers sued Grimaldi and MGM for producing and distributing a movie called Ginger and Fred. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 1:36 pm by Cicely Wilson
Grimaldi test, the Rogers test should not be imported wholesale to the right-of-publicity claims. [read post]