Search for: "Rogers v. State of South Carolina" Results 41 - 60 of 144
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2011, 6:43 am by Nathan Koppel
The case involved Michael Turner, a South Carolina man who was sent to jail for up to 12 months after missing child-support payments, which he insisted that he could not afford. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:30 am
As a result, Roger Waters of Pink Floyd fame could be banned from playing at the Nassau Coliseum in New York. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:43 am
South Carolina (2002) -- capital defendant's due process right to inform jury of his parole ineligibility FEC v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:48 am by Mark Walsh
As I wrote earlier this week, the descendants of plaintiffs in a companion case from South Carolina believe that Brown should be renamed Briggs v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 6:17 am by James Bickford
” Anderson, South Carolina’s Independent Mail looks ahead to the oral argument in Turner v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 3:01 am
-run facility in GTMO, rather than turning right to go to a U.S. facility in say, South Carolina. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:24 pm by Larkin Reynolds
 Those habeas claims, which challenged the legality of Padilla’s military detention at the Naval Consolidated Brig in South Carolina were, however, eventually made moot (after being re-filed in the District of South Carolina) when authorities transferred Padilla to civilian custody while he stood trial on criminal charges. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  This entailed that even a so-called “sovereign state” like South Carolina was without power to regulate who could serve as members of the ship’s crew. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 9:43 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 87835 (D SC, Aug. 8, 2011), a South Carolina federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2011 U.S. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 10:40 am by Kali Borkoski
Rogers, which was announced by Justice Breyer. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]