Search for: "Rogers v. Texas"
Results 41 - 60
of 443
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2018, 11:34 am
DISMISS and Opinion Filed November 8, 2018 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01064-CV SM ARCHITECTS, PLLC AND ROGER STEPHENS, Appellants V. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 6:18 pm
NANCY WILSON BRISCOE, JUDITH BROCK SEITZ, AND CAROLYN ROGERS, UPLAND RESOURCES, INC., KCS RESOURCES, INC., GREAT LAKES ENERGY PARTNERS, L.L.C. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 5:04 am
The question for the Texas Supreme Court in Piranha Partners et al. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 6:31 am
In Rogers v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 4:42 am
University of Texas at Austin, in which the Court will consider the University of Texas’s use of race in its undergraduate admissions process. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:25 pm
Pearson v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:17 am
The case is styled, Texas Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 3:43 pm
Justice Gorsuch with opinion in Texas v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:21 am
On March 23, 2016, the Supreme Court heard oral argument inZubik v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
NANCY WILSON BRISCOE, JUDITH BROCK SEITZ, AND CAROLYN ROGERS, UPLAND RESOURCES, INC., KCS RESOURCES, INC., GREAT LAKES ENERGY PARTNERS, L.L.C. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 5:42 pm
I expect the United States to file suit any minute in the Western District of Texas, Austin Division, where it will likely be assigned to Judge Roger Pitman, who tends to get most of the federal government's suits against Texas that are filed in Austin. [read post]
2 May 2009, 10:12 am
Per Curiam Opinion.EMINENT DOMAIN: TEXAS SUPREME COURT AGAIN RULES AGAINST PROPERTY OWNER IN CONDEMNATION DISPUTEState of Texas v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:41 am
Blakely v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 8:23 am
Facts: This case (Rogers v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 8:34 pm
This week, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeal decided round two of Vasilas v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 9:30 am
ROGER BATES, MICHAEL L. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 3:01 am
“An important win for property owners”: Supreme Court rules 8-0 that protected species habitat doesn’t include tracts containing no actual dusty gopher frogs and not inhabitable by them absent modification [Roger Pilon, George Will, earlier on Weyerhaeuser v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Texas v. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 8:56 pm
AND FRISCO MASTER PLAN v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 9:56 am
by Roger Alford A federal district court in Texas has held that the Alien Tort Statute (”ATS”) requires allegations of intent to violate international law. [read post]
