Search for: "Rogers v. United States Lines"
Results 41 - 60
of 355
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
Below is my column on Fox.com on the ruling in United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 5:46 pm
Judge Gonzalez Rogers is not prepared to decide on market definition, even on a preliminary basis, at this early stage--and she also notes that Epic focuses on harm to competitors so far, while any bottom-line impact on consumers under the rule of reason (where Apple could prevail by showing that what it does is ultimately good for consumers) would also need to be considered. [read post]
15 May 2013, 9:45 am
Cir. 2006)), and other times not (see Rogers v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm
Finally, recent United States Supreme Court cases Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 1:27 pm
Matthew Guarnieri, assistant to the solicitor general, argues for the United States. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 6:43 am
Worcester v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 11:45 am
Perry (challenging California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am
Guest post by Jake Linford, Loula Fuller and Dan Myers Professor, Florida State University College of Law, whose trademark law scholarship I have highlighted on JotwellI want to thank Lisa Ouellette for inviting me to blog about United States Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Georgia United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 11:14 am
This line of cases does more than create a conflict with Rogers and its progeny. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 4:23 am
United States by an equally divided court, with Justice Anthony Kennedy recused, for this blog. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 7:31 am
Phelps and United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 5:17 am
And in Edmond v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 5:01 am
This vacated a 2020 panel opinion that had rejected al-Hela’s claims on the grounds that, as a nonresident alien without presence or property in the United States, he possessed no constitutional due process rights. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
Importantly, the Court’s discussion of the source-identifying function of trademarks, repeated emphasis on source confusion as the principal harm in trademark law (see, e.g., the type of confusion “most commonly in trademark law’s sights”, “the bête noire of trademark law”, and the “cardinal sin under the law”), and discussion of the United We Stand America opinion suggests the Justices may like Rogers’ focus on preventing… [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:12 am
IRAP v. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 5:45 am
S., at 693; see United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:18 am
Waxman), and certain Democratic Members of the United States House of Representatives (Paul M. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 1:37 pm
In some ways this case is reminiscent of another case where a company’s branding consultant pushed the envelope (Roger Cleveland Golf v. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 8:26 am
Also known as the Johnson-Reed Act, the law replaced and expanded on the temporary Emergency Quota Act of 1921, which for the first time placed annual caps on the number of immigrants admitted to the United States and set a national origins quota system for newly arriving immigrants.U.S. [read post]
