Search for: "Rolls Royce Corp"
Results 41 - 58
of 58
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2010, 2:44 am
Rolls-Royce Corp., 570 F.3d 849 (7th Cir. 2009), the Seventh Circuit rejected the argument that a qui tam should be litigated along with a related employment action: Second, qui tam litigation is subject to requirements that make combining it with a personal damages suit awkward. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 1:15 pm
Rolls-Royce, PLC v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 10:51 am
Rolls-Royce, PLC v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 1:40 pm
Details: Rolls-Royce v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 8:29 am
But the money keeps pouring in because the companies manufacturing the device—General Electric and Rolls Royce—have traded favors with their representatives in Congress. [read post]
7 May 2010, 11:11 am
Rolls-Royce v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 4:47 am
– from The Word on Employment Law with John Phillips The Importance of Statistical Evidence - Randall v Rolls Royce – from Stephanie R. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm
Rolls Royce Motor Cars, Inc., 148 F.3d 136, 139 (2d Cir. 1998) (following Associated General Contractors formulation); City of Pittsburgh v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 4:44 am
“Did Patrick demand a Rolls Royce defense when a prudent trustee could have arrived at the same destination in a Buick, Chrysler or Taurus? [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
: Duhn Oil Tool, Inc v Cooper Cameron Corp (not precedential) (Patently-O) CAFC reverses ITC finding of non-infringement of design patent: Crocs, Inc v ITC (Inventive Step) (ITC Law Blog) (Class 99) (IP Frontline) CAFC: Visiting Judge explains potential downfalls of De Novo standard of claim construction review: Trading Techs. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
: Duhn Oil Tool, Inc v Cooper Cameron Corp (not precedential) (Patently-O) CAFC reverses ITC finding of non-infringement of design patent: Crocs, Inc v ITC (Inventive Step) (ITC Law Blog) (Class 99) (IP Frontline) CAFC: Visiting Judge explains potential downfalls of De Novo standard of claim construction review: Trading Techs. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 5:39 am
The second engine is being developed by General Electric Co and Britain’s Rolls-Royce. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 1:29 am
" Rolls-Royce Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 7:09 am
Rolls-Royce Corp., No. 08-3593, 2009 U.S. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Motors Corp., No. 08-1113ADA - Benefits to former employeeso o SCOTUS docket hereAdam v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 1:43 pm
Rolls-Royce Corp (civil case) [uploaded: 01/13/2009] [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 10:16 am
.; British Telecommunications plc; British-American Tobacco Co Ltd; BTG plc; Delphi Corp.; Dow Corning Ltd; Dyson Technology Ltd; ExxonMobil Chemical Ltd; Ford of Europe; Fujitsu Services Ltd; G E Healthcare; GKN plc; GlaxoSmithKline plc; Hewlett-Packard Ltd; IBM UK Ltd; Infineum UK Ltd; Kodak Ltd; Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd; Microsoft Ltd; Nestle UK Ltd; Nokia UK Ltd; NXP Semiconductors UK Limited; Pfizer Ltd; Philips Electronics UK Ltd; Pilkington Group Ltd; Procter & Gamble… [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 10:01 am
General Motors, Rolls-Royce and two smaller companies want the Supreme Court to reverse a 6th U.S. [read post]
