Search for: "Rosado v Rosado"
Results 41 - 60
of 145
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2006, 12:55 pm
While the a magistrate initially held that the plaintiffs claims were not barred because of Calderon-Rosado v. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 9:00 pm
Justice Mary V. [read post]
7 May 2019, 4:30 am
Bonnet Vázquez I. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:44 am
") AC32704 - State v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 2:46 pm
In Hines v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 5:02 am
Foto: Jewel of the Seas (Carnival) Descarga el documento: USA v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 12:12 pm
In Hines v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 5:00 am
The following is a guest post by Jesús Colón Rosado, an intern working in the Public Services Division at the Law Library of Congress. [read post]
6 May 2013, 3:11 pm
La Jueza Vélez Colón ofreció el mensaje especial de la ocasión. [read post]
18 May 2017, 7:53 am
De esta manera, el más alto Foro de Puerto Rico, en Rosado Muñoz et al. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 8:00 am
AbbottLitigating in the Zeitgeist: Rosado v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 6:12 am
“Attorneys representing clients in domestic relations matters are subject to particular rules (see 22 NYCRR part 1400), which ” ‘were designed to address abuses in the practice of matrimonial law and to protect the public’ ” (Rosado v Rosado, 100 AD3d 856, 856 [2012], quoting Hovanec v Hovanec, 79 AD3d 816, 817 [2010]). [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 7:17 am
CGL - ADDITIONAL INSURED - OTHER INSURANCE - PRIORITY OF COVERAGES Briarwoods Farm, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
In Rosado-Ciriello, et al, [Plaintiffs] v Yonkers City School District, et al, [District], the Appellate Division considered a proceeding pursuant to CPLR Article 78 to review a determination of the District, and to compel the District to consider "telework" as a viable work accommodation for the Plaintiffs' members in the collective bargaining unit. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
In Rosado-Ciriello, et al, [Plaintiffs] v Yonkers City School District, et al, [District], the Appellate Division considered a proceeding pursuant to CPLR Article 78 to review a determination of the District, and to compel the District to consider "telework" as a viable work accommodation for the Plaintiffs' members in the collective bargaining unit. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:55 pm
")AC31748 - Stepney v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:14 am
") AC30699 - Gaines v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 12:18 am
The presence of caution cones created a triable issue of fact as to prior actual notice of the condition, as defendants' witness admitted that they would place such caution cones to alert others to a slippery condition, and plaintiff denied that the cones were being used to prop open a door, as had been alleged by owner-defendants' witness.Student note: While the hearsay portions of a witness affidavit submitted in opposition to a summary judgment motion, which referred to an unidentified… [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 9:35 am
Rosado Marzán discusses last week’s dismissal of the union organizing case UNITE Here Local 355 v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 9:00 am
A recent case, Lake Naomi Club, Inc. v. [read post]
