Search for: "Rose v. State of California"
Results 41 - 60
of 462
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2007, 1:33 pm
The issue presented is whether the California state court's decision affirming the defendant's murder conviction was an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 11:19 am
In a 46-page majority opinion written by Justice Chin and joined by four other justices, punctuated by an 18-page concurring opinion (by Justice Liu, joined by Justice Werdegar) which reads like a dissent, the California Supreme Court reversed the First District Court of Appeal’s judgment in Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
The cert. petition seeks to overturn the California Supreme Court's decision in Rose v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 10:13 am
" These concerns were prompted by a ruling from a California District Court on August 13, 2010 in Center for Food Safety, et al. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 3:25 am
State of California Discovery—Medical Evidence—WCAB, granting removal, rescinded WCJ’s order requiring applicant to disclose all medical treatment she had received during last 10 years to her neck, upper extremities and wrists, and returned matter to trial level for further proceedings, when WCJ’s… Rose (Michael) v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 9:25 am
An earlier article examined alien land laws in the United States, telling the story of Oyama v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
Rose, Klein & Marias and David A. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 3:56 pm
Sheppard Mullin’s intellectual property group prevailed before the United States Supreme Court in the trademark matter entitled Hana Financial v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 4:33 pm
Rose, (9th Cir. 1990). [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 8:18 am
The number of Web vendors of cigarettes rose from 88 in 2000 to 772 early last year, according to the California attorney general's office. [read post]
31 May 2013, 3:33 pm
Washington (tribal-state compact)California ex rel. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 8:13 pm
-In re United States, ___ S.Ct. ___, 2018 U.S.LEXIS 6514 (U.S.Sup.Ct., Nov. 2, 2018, case no. 18A410); -Kelsey Cascadia Rose Juliana, et al. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 11:05 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California on civil rights cases. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 2:55 am
.
GONZALES v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 2:07 pm
Hernandez, the California Court of Appeal (First Appellate District, Division Five) expressly disagreed with Nicholson v. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 10:47 am
Ignjatov, a criminal case in California, the court found that the practice of allowing agents to use GPS devices without a warrant rose to the level of government misconduct because it clearly violated the Supreme Court’s 2012 decision. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
In SEC v. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 7:55 pm
The first case, United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 11:40 pm
LEXIS 18270.In Rose v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 9:00 am
More than ten requests for publication were filed in the Brinker case: Cross Country Healthcare, California Employment Law Council, Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo, Paul, Plevin, Sullivan, etc., Akin, Gump, Strauss, etc., Winston & Strawn, McKenna, Long & Aldridge, Sheppard Mullin, Wells Fargo, Proskauer Rose and Manatt Phelps Phillips. [read post]
