Search for: "Rosenstein v. Rosenstein" Results 41 - 60 of 185
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2018, 6:21 am by Hayley Evans
   Grayson Clary summarized the Fourth Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 2:39 am by Stephen Pitel
This has been the subject of debate in some recent Canadian decisions, notably the difference in approach between the Court of Appeal for Ontario and the Supreme Court of Canada in Lapointe Rosenstein Marchand Melançon LLP v Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, 2016 SCC 30 (available here). [read post]
13 May 2017, 8:51 am by Quinta Jurecic
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit heard oral argument in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
20 May 2017, 5:23 am by Matthew Kahn
Covering travel ban litigation, Jane summarized the oral arguments in Hawaii v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 1:49 pm by Helen Klein Murillo
Steve Vladeck and Benjamin Wittes argued that important caveats to the Nixon v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 11:16 am by Jordan Brunner
Harleen Gambhir summarized the District Court for the Western District of Washington’s certification of the class in Wagafe v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 8:51 am by Hannah Kris
Steve Vladeck discussed Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s views on Morrison v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 4:44 am
However, in opposition, the plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact as to whether the statute of limitations was tolled by the [**3] continuous representation doctrine (see Town of Wallkill v Rosenstein, 40 AD3d 972, 837 N.Y.S.2d 212; Tropp v Lumer, 23 AD3d 550, 806 N.Y.S.2d 599; Savarese v Shatz, 273 AD2d 219, 708 N.Y.S.2d 642). [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 3:18 am
" Here, the earliest ascertainable date that the plaintiffs' legal malpractice cause of action existed is December 21, 1992, the date that the agreement was entered into (see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295; Town of Wallkill v Rosenstein, 40 AD3d 972). [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 1:09 pm by Justin Florence, Larry Schwartztol
As our organization, United to Protect Democracy, pointed out in this memo, the Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2018, 12:23 pm by Quinta Jurecic
  The existing special counsel regulations only require Mueller to deliver a report to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein at the conclusion of his investigation, and allow Rosenstein to decide whether to provide that report to Congress. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 3:44 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
According to Calabresi, "Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein's appointment of Robert Mueller is unconstitutional both under the test for officer inferiority set forth in Justice Scalia's opinion in Edmond v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 3:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Trust v Saad, 72 AD3d 1019, 1020; Town of Wallkill v Rosenstein, 40 AD3d 972, 974). [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 9:35 pm by Richard J. Pierce, Jr.
Supreme Court in February in Lucia v. [read post]