Search for: "Ross v. Texas" Results 41 - 60 of 277
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2019, 11:29 am by Peter Margulies
The March 6 decision by Judge Richard Seeborg of the Northern District of California in California v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 11:10 am
Supreme Court Justice Harry Blackmun used baseball trivia in the baseball antitrust case Flood v. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 11:46 am by Eric Goldman
The plaintiff is represented by Browne George Ross, the same law firm that brought the unsuccessful Prager U v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 8:54 am by Don Cruse
The court of appeals affirmed, concluding that under TEXAS WEST OAKS HOSPITAL, LP AND TEXAS HOSPITAL HOLDINGS, LLC v. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 12:02 pm by Wolfgang Demino
 LOTS OF TRICKY TRAPS(TRAP = TEXAS RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE) TRAP 25.1(d)(7)(B)JULIAN ROSS, Appellant,v.SPERO HOLDINGS, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, AND DANIEL JAMES MANAGEMENT, INC., A NEVADA CORPORATION, Appellees.No. 05-17-01011-CVCourt of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas.Opinion Filed November 7, 2017.Julian Ross, for Appellant, Pro se.Andrew H. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 12:02 pm by Wolfgang Demino
 LOTS OF TRICKY TRAPS(TRAP = TEXAS RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE) TRAP 25.1(d)(7)(B)JULIAN ROSS, Appellant,v.SPERO HOLDINGS, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, AND DANIEL JAMES MANAGEMENT, INC., A NEVADA CORPORATION, Appellees.No. 05-17-01011-CVCourt of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas.Opinion Filed November 7, 2017.Julian Ross, for Appellant, Pro se.Andrew H. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Bingham of Ohio and the Historical Context of the Fourteenth Amendment" Cynthia Nicoletti (Assistant Professor of Law, Mississippi College School of Law) "The Disputed Constitutionality of the Emancipation Proclamation"11:00-12:30 | Panel TwoStephen Mihm (University of Georgia), chairPaul Kens (Professor of Political Science, Texas State University at San Marcos) "Big Business and the Reconstruction Amendments: Lessons from Munn v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 11:08 am
Ross, 32 S.W.3d 853 (Texas Court of Criminal Appeals 2000). [read post]
10 May 2018, 2:55 am by Walter Olson
We’re very deferential to the Board, but even so, the NLRB’s reasoning here is ‘too opaque.'” [John Kenneth Ross, Short Circuit, on Oncor v. [read post]