Search for: "Rothwell v. Rothwell"
Results 41 - 56
of 56
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
See Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 7:58 pm
EST In Bilski v. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 2:06 pm
On November 19, a panel of experts at American University’s Washington College of Law will address the potential consequences for patent law of Bilski v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 11:01 am
City of Spokane v. [read post]
25 Jul 2009, 8:52 am
Rothwell, Mark M. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 10:44 pm
In today’s case (Slocombe v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 1:31 am
The Damages (Asbestos-related Conditions) (Scotland) Act 2009 came into force on 17 June 2009 and reverses the 2007 decision of the House of Lords, Rothwell v Chemical & Insulating Company, which barred the right to compensation for pleural plaques. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 10:57 pm
One more out of Division III: Rothwell v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 2:20 am
The right to be compensated was removed by the decision of the House of Lords in 2007, Rothwell v Chemical & Insulating Company.The Association of British Insurers has criticised the Bill stating that it is "fundamentally flawed. [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 4:11 am
My weekly podcast roundup of the top family law news and best family law blog posts:The Week in Focus 21st February 2009Stories/posts referred to in this podcast:Court has left these parents in hell - Telegraph Justice Ministry to bar parents from telling their own stories - IndependentBaby P case sparks hike in care applications - Law Society GazetteBaby P: GSCC confirms interim suspensions for social workers - Community CareFamily Law Week blog: Child Protection roundupJudge bans further… [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 6:52 am
The Scottish Government has published a consultation paper on its proposal to introduce legislation before the summer recess in order to overturn the House of Lords' 17 October 2007 decision (Rothwell v Chemical Insulating Company Ltd [2007] UKHL 39) that asymptomatic pleural plaques are not compensable (click here to view further information on this judgment). [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 1:47 am
NEI International Combustion Ltd.; Rothwell v. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 2:22 am
Pleural plaques provide no cause of action Rothwell v Chemical and Insulating Co Ltd and Another; Topping v Benchtown Ltd (formerly Jones Bros Preston Ltd); Johnston v NEI International Combustion Ltd; Grieves v F. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 2:05 am
Rothwell v Chemical and Insulating Co Ltd and another; Topping v Bench Town Ltd (formerly Jones Bros Preston Ltd); Johnston v NEI International Combustion Ltd; Grieves v F T Everard & Sons Ltd and another [2007] UKHL 39 “A person who developed pleural plaques as a result of having been negligently exposed to asbestos in the course of his employment, could not sue his employers for negligence because the presence of pleural plaques did… [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 1:49 am
NEI International Combustion Limited (Original Respondents and Cross-appellants) Rothwell (Original Appellant and Cross-respondent) v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 12:05 am
Co. v. [read post]
