Search for: "Rounds v. Clements"
Results 41 - 60
of 106
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2011, 7:46 am
Gutierrez and Holder v. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 11:24 am
UPDATE: Marcia Coyle has an article here (subscription req'd) in the National Law Journal about the upcoming case Weyerhaeuser v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 6:44 am
Montana, and notes that two former Solicitors General – Paul Clement and Gregory Garre – will face off in the case. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 10:47 am
” The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket summarizes a preview with Paul Clement on these same cases. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:42 am
Monday’s decision in Florence v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 9:44 am
The one most recently resolved by the Court was Financial Industries Corp. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
Mr Gervase Duffield v The Independent, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Ms Hayley Quinn v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott v The Times, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott and Mr James Elliott v The Sun, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mrs Jane Clarke v Northwich Guardian, Clause 5, 01/02/2012; Mr Peter Vince-Lindsay v Daily Mail, Clause 1 01/02/2012. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:46 am
And Slate finishes out its twelve-part series reviewing the Supreme Court’s Term, featuring commentary and analysis by Dahlia Lithwick, Paul Clement, and Walter Dellinger. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:11 am
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 5:41 am
Alabama and Jackson v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
Events 27 February 2012, ‘Open Justice Week’, initiative asking writers, legal professionals and members of the public to collaborate using social media to share their experiences of a week in the life of the legal system. 28 February 2012, 1pm, ‘Consent of the Networked: The Worldwide Struggle for Internet Freedom‘ – Rebecca MacKinnon, at Polis, LSE, Clement House Room 302 (Third Floor), Clement House, 99 Aldwych. 29 February 2012, 9am-2pm.… [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:38 am
Michael Kirkland of UPI discusses FCC v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:37 am
Hopwood notes that Paul Clement’s use of the phrase “unprecedented and unbounded” in his brief for the ACA challengers echoes a phrase used by the Chief Justice in the Court’s opinion in United Haulers Association, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 7:24 am
The Brown v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 7:51 am
Wednesday’s argument in Snyder v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 9:27 am
(At ACS blog, Jeffrey Clements disputes Citizens United’s criticism of the Kagan nomination.) [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 7:31 am
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
’ 28 February 2012, 1pm, ‘Consent of the Networked: The Worldwide Struggle for Internet Freedom‘ – Rebecca MacKinnon’, at Polis, LSE, Clement House Room 302 (Third Floor), Clement House, 99 Aldwych. 29 February 2012, 9am-2pm. ‘Justice Wide Open‘. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 1:58 pm
” Wired reports on Bowman v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 7:57 am
At Slate’s Breakfast Table, Paul Clement notes that the ruling in the patent case Bilski v. [read post]
