Search for: "Rubin v. Rubin" Results 41 - 60 of 801
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2023, 4:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” A court may grant a stay where the determination in one action may dispose or limit issues in a separate action (Uptown Healthcare Mgmt., Inc. v Rivkin Raddler LLP, 116 AD3d 631 [1st Dept 2014]; SSA Holdings LLC v Kaplan, 120 A.D.3d 1111 [1st Dept 2014]). [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Nonetheless, the court's action struck me as sufficiently worth noting; here is one of the decisions that the court upheld, Judge Rubin's decision in Smith v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Indian Americans Rapidly Climbing Political Ranks DNyuz – Maggie Astor and Jill Cowan (New York Times) | Published: 2/27/2023 Despite being one of the largest immigrant groups in the U.S., Americans of Indian descent in 20123 were barely represented in politics. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 11:37 am by Joseph L. Hyde
  As John Rubin noted, “North Carolina was a common law state when it came to self-defense. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 3:30 am by Edward Rubin
Edward Rubin The Supreme Court’s use of the major questions doctrine in West Virginia v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 4:23 am by Peter Mahler
The Care One Case The above facts are drawn from a not-for-publication opinion handed down last month by a three-judge panel of the New Jersey Appellate Division — that state’s intermediate appellate court — in a case captioned Care One, LLC, et al. v Adina Straus and Jeffrey Rubin. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 7:24 am
" It's Washington Post column by Jennifer Rubin. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 5:08 am by Verushka Reddy
  On the contrary she admitted that she used cannabis for medicinal and recreational purposes, outside of work, and contended that it was her right to do so, relying on the judgment of the Constitutional Court in Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development and Others v Prince (Clarke and Others Intervening); National Director of Public Prosecutions and Others v Rubin; National Director of Public Prosecutions and Others v Acton. [read post]