Search for: "Russell Bartlett"
Results 41 - 60
of 63
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2019, 1:01 pm
Bartlett, and Virginia argued Virginia House of Delegates v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:47 am
Bartlett, scheduled for oral argument on March 19, in which the Court will consider whether federal law preempts a state-law design defect claim against a generic drug manufacturer. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 6:21 pm
Legal Times LexisNexis Marcus Letter Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin McInnes Cooper McMillan LLP McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC Meagher & Green Moye White LLP O'Melveny & Myers LLP Patterson Belknap Webb Tyler, LLP Patton Boggs, LLP Post & Schell Russell Reynolds Associates… [read post]
30 May 2019, 7:15 am
Bartlett, ruling that a plaintiff’s First Amendment retaliatory-arrest claim failed because police officers had probable cause to arrest him. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am
[et al.].New York : Russell Sage Foundation, c2010. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 6:01 am
Xie (MIT Sloan School of Management), on Monday, August 23, 2021 Tags: Disclosure, Index funds, Information asymmetries, Institutional Investors, Mutual funds, Retail investors The Board’s Role in Sustainable Leadership Posted by Laura Sanderson, PJ Neal, and Emily Meneer, Russell Reynolds Associates LLP, on Monday, August 23, 2021 Tags: Board oversight, Boards of Directors, Climate change, Corporate… [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:29 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as counsel to the respondents in this case.] [read post]
17 Jan 2006, 8:16 am
"None at this point have signed up for a debt-management plan," said Executive Director Russell Graves. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am
Bartlett, a case the court added to its merits docket yesterday, gives the justices another chance to “consider the effect of probable cause on First Amendment retaliation claim. [read post]
31 May 2019, 7:05 am
’” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 10:14 am
The official historian of Simpson, Thatcher and Bartlett spoke for a number of Wall Street law firms when he later reported that Simpson, Thatcher had suffered fewer disruptions during World War II than during the much-shorter World War I because “there were women lawyers who could be recruited to do some of the work formerly handled by male associates who had joined the armed forces. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 6:02 am
Monks and Nell Minow, ValueEdge Advisors, on Saturday, July 25, 2020 Tags: Climate change, DOL, Environmental disclosure, ERISA, ESG, Fiduciary rule, Institutional Investors, Retirement plans, Securities regulation, Sustainability The Board’s Role in Guiding the Return to Work Posted by Erica Volini, Steve Hatfield, and Jeff Schwartz, Deloitte Consulting LLP, on Sunday, July 26, 2020 Tags: Boards of Directors, Corporate… [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:32 am
(Disclosure: Kevin of Howe & Russell represents the petitioner.) [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 12:03 am
Russell. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 9:18 am
Russell & Co., who spoke at a generational diversity discussion in Georgia. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:29 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to POM Wonderful in this case. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
Princeton was represented by lawyers from Lowenstein Sandler and Simpson Thacher & Bartlett. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 7:05 am
Russell Bartlett was arrested for disorderly conduct and harassment. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 1:06 pm
Applying a broad definition, 13 of the 38 cases in which the Supreme Court has granted review for the upcoming October 2018 term raise criminal law and related issues. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm
Bartlett (1984), courts are limited to the statutory text, legislative history, and views of the Executive Branch or can instead also consider other external indicia; and (2) whether the lower court properly ruled that a Native American tribe's reservation had been "disestablished. [read post]
