Search for: "Russell v. Howe"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,806
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2018, 3:22 pm
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case. ] The post Event announcement: April 17 panels on South Dakota v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 8:35 am
See Ormco v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am
In a guest post, Russell Sandberg is critical of the recent judgment in Michaela School… The media reports of the last few months highlight how controversial and charged the decision in R (on the Application of TTT) v Michaela School [2024] EWHC 843 (Admin) is. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 8:47 am
Please note that Howe & Russell and the Stanford Supreme Court Litigation Clinic filed a brief in support of respondents in Ricci. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 2:58 am
” [Russell Ryan, Ashley Parrish, Ilya Shapiro, and William Yeatman on Cato amicus brief in Lucia v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 7:00 am
Yesterday Howe & Russell and Akin Gump, in conjunction with the Stanford Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, filed this cert. petition, raising a question regarding the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA). [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 7:59 am
Today Howe & Russell, in conjunction with our winter term Harvard Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, is filing this amicus brief on behalf of Constitutional Law Scholars in Al-Marri v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 9:15 pm
Today’s petition of the day is: Note: Goldstein, Howe & Russell represents the petitioner in this caseTitle: Consolidation Coal Co. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 4:56 pm
Below, Howe & Russell’s Kevin Russell recaps today’s argument in Jones v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 5:38 am
appeared first on Russell D. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 5:53 am
Bank v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 6:46 am
Note: David was on the Stanford team that along with Howe & Russell filed an amicus brief in this case on behalf of Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law et al. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:35 pm
petition of the day is: Note: Goldstein, Howe & Russell represents the petitioner in this case, which is listed without regard to its chance of being granted.Title: Edwards v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:39 am
See United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 5:40 am
 This morning Anna Christensen of Howe & Russell discusses the issues in the case on SCOTUSblog. 11 a.m. - In Hertz Corporation v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 7:00 am
Today’s Petition of the Day is: Note: Goldstein, Howe & Russell, P.C. serves as counsel to the respondent this case. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:10 am
For the petitioner, his counsel: Paul Lettow of Jones Day For the respondents, their counsel: Beth Stephens of the Center for Justice and Accountability [Disclosure: Akin Gump and Howe & Russell also represent the respondents in this case.] [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 7:30 pm
US v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 2:16 pm
The following is by Eliza Presson of Howe & Russell Kermit Roosevelt had this opinion in the Christian Science Monitor on "wiser" and more useful criteria by which to evaluate the decisions of the Court this past term. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 7:05 am
[Disclosure: Lawyers associated with Akin Gump and Howe & Russell represent the petitioner in Magwood.] [read post]
