Search for: "S. R.C. T." Results 41 - 60 of 522
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2018, 10:46 am by MBettman
At issue in this case is whether a creditor’s failure to present a claim against a decedent’s estate within the six-month statute of limitations of R.C. 2117.06(C) precludes a later action against the decedent’s surviving spouse under Ohio’s necessaries statute, R.C. 3103.03. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 3:23 am by Jon Hyman
MT @jonhyman: Does this mean you don’t think we need ENDA? [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 6:47 am by MBettman
S.F., 483 S.W.3d 385 (Mo.2016) (Missouri’s law, similar to R.C. 2903.11, regulates conduct not speech. [read post]
So the recent class certification in the Central District of California in a case against R.C. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
  R.C. 5709.121, which contains an expanded definition of “exclusive charitable use”, residential use doesn’t defeat the exemption so long as such use is purely incidental to the charitable purposes of the property owner. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 3:55 pm by Eugene Volokh
” As I blogged when the court of appeals decision was handed down, that can’t be right: It is a proper part of the lawmaker’s business, it seems to me, to decide the remedies available in lawsuits, and whether the remedies should be discretionary or mandatory, even when the consequence is “unwarranted litigation” and the pressure to give in to plaintiffs. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 5:10 am by MBettman
In a 4-3 opinion, the court struck down R.C. 2907.03(A)(13) on its face, on equal protection grounds. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 1:33 pm
Ohio's highest court resolved conflicting state court decisions without batting an eye: We hold that a police officer’s unaided visual estimation of a vehicle’s speed, by itself, is sufficient to support a conviction for violation of R.C. 4511.21 (D) without independent verification of the vehicles speed if the officer is trained, is certified by the Ohio Peace Officer Training Academy or a similar organization…and is experienced in… [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 1:17 pm by Lisa Whittaker
The Supreme Court disagreed, concluding that: R.C. 4123.90 when viewed in conjunction with R.C.4123.95 and read in pari materia, places an implicit affirmative responsibility on an employer to provide its employee notice of the employee's discharge within a reasonable time after the discharge occurs in order to avoid impeding the discharged employee's 90-day notification obligation under R.C.4123.90. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 10:16 am by MBettman
At issue in this case is whether a creditor’s failure to present a claim against a decedent’s estate within the six-month statute of limitations of R.C. 2117.06(C) precludes a later action against the decedent’s surviving spouse under Ohio’s necessaries statute, R.C. 3103.03. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 8:25 am by MBettman
Father’s Argument Lower courts in Ohio are split on the issue of what qualifies as maintenance and support under R.C. 3107.07(A). [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 11:55 am by MBettman
Therefore, R.C. 2107.15—Ohio’s voiding statute—does not apply to a noncomplying will under R.C. 2107.24. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 9:48 am by MBettman
The definition of “victim” in R.C. 2929.18 shouldn’t be read as narrowly as the defendant advocates, limited only to persons named in an indictment. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 5:25 am by MBettman
R.C. 2929.19(B)(5) (Before imposing financial sanctions under R.C. 2929.18, the trial court is required to consider the felony offender’s present and future ability to pay the sanction.) [read post]