Search for: "S.C.1"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,300
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
Certainly the technology exists to link the scholarly criticism with a case citation, just as we link subsequent judicial treatment by overruling, limiting, and criticizing. [1] Laura Eggertson, “Lancet retracts 12-year-old article linking autism to MMR vaccines,” 182 Canadian Med. [read post]
25 May 2023, 3:25 pm
See S.C. [read post]
18 May 2023, 4:00 am
Summary of the law on disqualification of counsel There’s lots to say on the rules and case law relating to lawyer disqualification for conflicts of interest,[1] but for present purposes I can be fairly brief. [read post]
13 May 2023, 7:30 am
Case citation: Nicolet Law Office S.C. v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 6:10 am
S.C. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 3:36 pm
The government’s consultation relates to a potential second round of significant Competition Act amendments, following a first round of recent amendments that were passed in June 2022 (see Budget Implementation Act, 2022, No. 1, S.C. 2022, c. 10). [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 9:03 am
Here are the top tips from 17 lawyers who are winning the game in law firm marketing. 1. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) was required to appear before a Georgia grand jury and assert any Speech or Debate objections on a question by question basis, I expect the courts will require Pence to do the same. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 7:34 pm
Harrity & Harrity will be offering a webinar entitled "Diversity Dialogue ThinkTank: An Update on Programs to Increase the Representation of Women in IP" on March 1, 2023 at 3:00 pm (ET). [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Code §§ 7-2509.11(1) (2018), 22-4506(a) (Cum. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 3:38 am
Pursuant to South Carolina Code Annotated (S.C. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 2:16 pm
State of South Carolina, et al., South Carolina’s Supreme Court did what I predicted it might: holding that article I, section 10 of the South Carolina Constitution created a protected (albeit limited) privacy interest in the right to abortion.[1] Planned Parenthood stemmed from a challenge to S.C. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 1:14 pm
Trade Comm’n, supra note 1. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 2:11 pm
However, these two safeguards were removed in 2011 following the enactment of the Protecting Victims from Sex Offenders Act, S.C. 2010, c. 17. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 2:53 pm
Code § 19-1-180. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
., No. 2020-CP-38-000265 (S.C. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 9:30 am
”According to S.C. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 9:30 am
” According to S.C. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am
Vinnik, 127 A.D.2d 310, 317–318, 515 N.Y.S.2d 1 [1st Dept. 1987]). [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 12:28 pm
Medical Univ. of S.C., decided today by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker (D.S.C.): Plaintiff John Doe, proceeding pro se, filed this civil action on May 31, 2022. [read post]
