Search for: "S.W. v. State (In re S.W.)" Results 41 - 60 of 869
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am by MOTP
Reyes, 272 S.W.3d 588, 592 (Tex. 2008) (noting that, by enacting the TCHRA, the Texas Legislature "intended to correlate state law with federal law in employment discrimination cases") (quoting Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:00 am by John Day
App. 2006) (Georgia law held to apply to Georgia school bus wreck that occurred in Tennessee); In re Bridgestone/Firestone, 138 S.W.3d 202 (Tenn. [read post]
18 May 2012, 6:57 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Justice, 148 S.W.3d 374, 381-82 (Tex.2004) (examining federal law when interpreting state statute that incorporated federal statute). [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 10:57 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Brown, however, does not state that the value as reflected on the tax rolls is of no probative value.Ouzenne also relies on In re Marriage of Scott, 117, S.W.3d 580, 585 (Tex. [read post]
18 May 2012, 6:57 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Justice, 148 S.W.3d 374, 381-82 (Tex.2004) (examining federal law when interpreting state statute that incorporated federal statute). [read post]