Search for: "SANTEE v STATE" Results 41 - 60 of 60
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
National Indian Law Library Bulletin (1/3/2020)
6 Jan 2020, 4:06 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States (Federal Recognition) State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlWalter v. [read post]
Turtle Talk - http://turtletalk.wordpress.com/
Who can join in an Original case?
30 Mar 2009, 9:50 am
  That is the issue that the Court said it would consider at a hearing in South Carolina v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
“The Year in CEQA: A Look Back”
1 Nov 2013, 3:25 pm by Arthur F. Coon
East Bay Regional Park Dist.(1st Dist.) 215 Cal.App.4th 353; Preserve Wild Santee v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
No Mechanic's Lien on Property for Which Materials Have Been Fabricated but Not Delivered
21 Jan 2009, 2:02 am
Santee Wando Const., 400 S.E.2d 498 (S.C. [read post]
South Carolina Construction Law - http://southcarolinaconstructionlawyer.com
[Jonathan H. Adler] Court blocks federal government’s ‘guidance’ on transgender bathrooms
22 Aug 2016, 2:30 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
 The decision, in yet another case captioned Texas v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A Federal Case For Plaintiff Representation in Structured Settlements
12 Jul 2010, 11:45 am by structuredsettlements
Santee Frozen Foods, Inc., 309 S.C. 13 (Ct. [read post]
Structured Settlements 4Real - http://structuredsettlements.typepad.com/structured_settlements_4r/
Why Daubert standard should not be adopted by South Carolina
17 Jun 2008, 5:55 pm
John Nichols wrote a great article for The South Carolina Lawyer Bulletin for Spring 2008 discussing the admissibility of expert's opinions pursuant to Rule 702, and the lack of necessity for South Carolina to adopt the federal standard described as Daubert for the infamous 1993 decision Daubert v. [read post]
South Carolina Nursing Home Blog - http://www.scnursinghomelaw.com/
CEQA Remedies Statute Authorizes Writ Partially Decertifying EIR and Leaving Project Approvals In Place
11 Dec 2017, 3:26 pm by Arthur F. Coon
” The Court found support for its view in Preserve Wild Santee v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
The key to settling a big fight
27 Dec 2010, 4:40 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The case was South Carolina v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Remedial Legal Logic: Fifth District Doubles Down On Split with Other Districts in Holding CEQA Doesn’t Allow Limited Writ Remedy of Partial EIR Decertification – But Does It Really Matter?
29 Nov 2020, 8:08 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Thus, in Preserve Wild Santee v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Are Courts Actively Limiting CEQA’s Scope In The Absence of Meaningful Legislative Reform?
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am by Arthur F. Coon
City of Santa Clara (2011) 194 Cal.App.4th 1150; City of Santee v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Jessica’s Law too vague to enforce?
29 Nov 2009, 1:34 am
State Sen. [read post]
Sex Offender Research by A Voice of Reason - http://sexoffenderresearch.blogspot.com/
Sixth District Holds Downtown San Jose Office Project FSEIR’s Brief Discussion And Rejection of “Compensatory” Mitigation for Historic Buildings Razed By Project Was Informationally Adequate Under CEQA Based On City’s Unchallenged Factual Finding That No Similar Historic Buildings Existed Elsewhere In City’s Downtown
22 May 2023, 10:58 am by Arthur F. Coon
City of Santee (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 260, 274, my 11/28/12 post on which can be found here; and Masonite Corp. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Are Courts Actively Limiting CEQA’s Scope In The Absence of Meaningful Legislative Reform?
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am by Arthur F. Coon
City of Santa Clara (2011) 194 Cal.App.4th 1150; City of Santee v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
2010 CEQA UPDATE
5 Jan 2011, 10:19 am by Abbott & Kindermann
City of Santee v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
First District Holds EIR’s Analysis of “No Project” Alternative To City of Livermore Residential Development Violated CEQA By Failing To Discuss Feasibility Of Purchasing And Preserving Habitat-Rich Garaventa Hills Project Site, Also Addresses Significant Issues Involving Exhaustion Doctrine And Adequacy of Mitigation
4 Apr 2022, 1:15 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Save the Hill Group v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Proposed CEQA Guidelines Amendments: A Critique of OPR’s “Preliminary Discussion Draft” (Part III – Proposed “Minor Technical Improvements”)
26 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of Santa Clara (2011) 194 Cal.App.4th 1150 [City’s and RDA’s approval of detailed term sheet for 49ers stadium project was not project approval]; City of Santee v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
The Party of Lincoln
13 Oct 2020, 3:46 am by SHG
Remember Buck v. [read post]
Simple Justice - http://blog.simplejustice.us
Proposed CEQA Guidelines Amendments: A Critique Of OPR’s “Preliminary Discussion Draft” (Part I – Proposed “Efficiency Improvements”)
18 Sep 2015, 4:54 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Real Estate Group v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Contentious House Hearing On EPA Climate Change Rules
9 Feb 2011, 1:35 pm by WIMS
The discussion draft overturns the landmark Supreme Court case Massachusetts v. [read post]
eNewsUSA - http://enewsusa.blogspot.com/