Search for: "SCOTUS RULING"
Results 41 - 60
of 6,891
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
I look forward to hearing the Supreme Court's ruling on Moody v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 12:30 pm
" But the lower courts are deeply split on what evidence people can use to prove up retaliatory arrest, and SCOTUS should surely take a look. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:52 am
Here’s the Friday morning read: Supreme Court Rules Against Women Whose Cars Were Seized by the Police (Adam Liptak, The New York Times) US Supreme Court rules against Warner Music in copyright damages case (Blake Brittain, Reuters) Sotomayor reflects on fairness, justice in virtual Albany talk (Patrick Tine, The Times Union) Solicitors general, past and present, reflect on ups and downs of job and arguing before SCOTUS (Mark Walsh, ABA Journal) Supreme Court says… [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:35 am
So too, administrators at public universities bound by the First Amendment of its own force or at private ones that abide First Amendment norms are also entitled to enforce reasonable content-neutral rules governing use of public spaces. [read post]
9 May 2024, 9:19 am
The Justices ruled 6-3 that “the Copyright Act entitles a copyright owner to recover damages for any timely claim,” with no limit preventing recovery for infringement that happened beyond three years. [read post]
9 May 2024, 9:19 am
The Justices ruled 6-3 that “the Copyright Act entitles a copyright owner to recover damages for any timely claim,” with no limit preventing recovery for infringement that happened beyond three years. [read post]
7 May 2024, 3:15 am
Last month, Dave blogged about the SCOTUS’s decision in the Macquarie case, in which the Court held that a company’s “pure omission” to disclose information concerning known trends required by Item 303 of Regulation S-K could not serve as the basis for a private securities fraud claim. [read post]
6 May 2024, 6:30 am
That ruling was subsequently overruled. [read post]
4 May 2024, 12:08 pm
The materials listed several examples of revenue rulings regarding housing and employment. [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:35 am
On April 16, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States (“SCOTUS”) released its opinion in DeVillier v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 9:20 am
’” The post SCOTUS Rules Double Jeopardy Bans Retrial of Defendant Found Non-Guilty by Reason of Insanity appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 9:18 am
Bucking the predominant trend in the WDPA, the Court granted Spongelle’s motion to dismiss and ruled that, “based on the weight of authority in this Circuit, Murphy’s Complaint fails to state a claim under Title III of the ADA. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
I expect to have something to say about the hush-money trial and the Weinstein ruling at some point. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 11:05 am
The question I asked everyone was: “Is the most likely outcome of the challenge to the rule: (1) struck down by SCOTUS; (2) upheld by SCOTUS; (3) never reaches SCOTUS (for any reason, including denial of cert, withdrawal of rule by future administration, etc.). [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 5:03 am
The post Society for the Rule of Law video on SCOTUS immunity argument appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:59 pm
A ruling in late June is highly likely. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
” The post SCOTUS Rules FBI Must Face Lawsuit Over No-Fly List appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 9:15 am
The Court ruled last year that Sections 1114(1)(a) and 1125(a)(1) of the Lanham Act are not extraterritorial in nature and that “‘use in commerce’ provides the dividing line between foreign and domestic applications of these provisions. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 9:15 am
The Court ruled last year that Sections 1114(1)(a) and 1125(a)(1) of the Lanham Act are not extraterritorial in nature and that “‘use in commerce’ provides the dividing line between foreign and domestic applications of these provisions. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 9:00 am
Supreme Court’s (SCOTUS’s) new workplace discrimination decision, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (EEOC’s) final rule on the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA), and how recent artificial intelligence (AI) hiring tools have violated federal anti-bias laws. [read post]
