Search for: "SEC v. Current Financial Services, Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 223
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm by Gary Gensler
Joseph Kennedy, the first Chairman of the SEC, had a saying: “No honest business need fear the SEC. [read post]
The SEC’s Proposed Rule on Climate-Related Disclosures Federal financial services regulators have made clear their intention to use their regulatory power to protect market participants from alleged abuses relating to ESG. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Jim Dempsey
The cybersecurity provisions of the privacy bill cover vastly more entities than are monitored by the financial services regulators or examined by the SEC. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Richard Zelichov and Trevor T. Garmey
  These included (1) the impact of Covid on current and future operations; (2) the impact on capital and financial resources; (3) any material impairments on financial statements; (4) Covid-related impacts on business continuity plans; and (5) disruptions in supply chains and the methods for distributing products. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 1:39 pm by Kevin LaCroix
IronNet was a private company providing cyber security services. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 9:00 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Ryan Amelio
”[12] The June ETS primarily requires the use of personal protective equipment (“PPE”) in “all settings where any employee provides healthcare services or healthcare support services. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:30 am by Sherron Watkins
This last action, the current period write off of the Raptor accounting structures, had been announced in Enron’s quarterly earnings statement made on Tuesday, October 16, 2001. [read post]
14 May 2021, 8:01 am by John Jascob
Republicans offered amendments to all three bills that would have provided that a public company need not make a disclosure unless the thing to be disclosed met the materiality standard expressed by the Supreme Court in TSC Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 7:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
"Incorrigible" is defined as a person who is "incapable of being corrected, not reformable" (Merriam-Webster) and, thus this term is completely out of line with the current understanding of the goals of our Family Court system. [read post]